Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | FEEM working papers "Note di lavoro" series |
规范类型 | 论文 |
The Political Economy of Environment-Development Relationships: A Preliminary Framework | |
Robert T. Deacon | |
发表日期 | 2000 |
出处 | Climate Change and Sustainable Development |
出版年 | 2000 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | The levels of public goods provided by government are determined in part by the form of political institutions in a country. Countries governed by democratic institutions arguably will provide public goods at different levels than countries ruled by autocrats or an elite group. To examine this proposition, the present paper develops a simple neoclassical theory of public good provision that allows for different political institutions. Differences in government form are based on a concept of inclusiveness. A government's structure of governance is inclusive if it takes into account the costs and benefits of the entire population when deciding public good levels. A less than inclusive government considers only the costs and benefits accruing to a subset of the population. Under plausible conditions the theory implies that public consumption goods, those that affect individual utilities directly rather than entering production functions as inputs, will be underprovided by less inclusive governments (similar to Mancur Olson and Martin McGuire.) This theory is tested with cross-country data on forms of government and provision of public goods. The provision of environmental public goods (the availability of safe water and sanitation facilities and regulations on the lead content of gasoline) is emphasised, though provision of public schooling and roads is also examined. The form of government is represented by combining data on the method of selecting government executives and representatives, the degree of power exercised by the legislature vs. the executive, the degree to which nominating processes are competitive, the practice of excluding political groups and parties, and other criteria. The empirical estimates are consistent with the theory, indicating that (after controlling for differences in income and other factors) the least democratic governments in the sample provide public goods at levels 30%-60% below the most democratic governments. JEL: H4, Q2 |
特色分类 | H4,Q2 |
URL | https://www.feem.it/en/publications/feem-working-papers-note-di-lavoro-series/the-political-economy-of-environment-development-relationships-a-preliminary-framework/ |
来源智库 | Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (Italy) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/116496 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Robert T. Deacon. The Political Economy of Environment-Development Relationships: A Preliminary Framework. 2000. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
NDL2000-003.pdf(1649KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Robert T. Deacon]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Robert T. Deacon]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Robert T. Deacon]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。