| 来源类型 | Article
|
| 规范类型 | 其他
|
| DOI | 10.1016/0040-1625(80)90082-7
|
| Technological learning, technological substitution, and technological change. |
| Robinson JM
|
| 发表日期 | 1980
|
| 出处 | Technological Forecasting and Social Change 18 (1): 39-49
|
| 出版年 | 1980
|
| 语种 | 英语
|
| 摘要 | From a simple dynamic model of competition between product lines it is shown that the shape of learning curves has a powerful influence on the dynamics of technological substitution. Learning of both production efficiency and marketing efficiency is considered. It is asserted that both types of learning are important and that the two are complementary. It is further speculated that production learning is probably more important for commodities and in situations of low per capita income, whereas market learning gains ascendancy in cases of high income and specialized and diversified product lines. In closing, it is noted that simple competitive models are misleading, first because complementarities and coevolutionary processes are probably as important in the overall development of technology as are competitive processes, and second because optimization of the technological system's parts does not guarantee improvement of the performance of the system as a whole. |
| 主题 | Management and Technology Area (MMT)
|
| URL | http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/12654/
|
| 来源智库 | International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria)
|
| 引用统计 |
|
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/126741
|
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714 |
Robinson JM. Technological learning, technological substitution, and technological change.. 1980.
|
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
