| 来源类型 | Article |
| 规范类型 | 其他 |
| DOI | 10.3763/cpol.2004.0426 |
| Clashing strategic cultures and climate policy. | |
| Ceronsky M; Hepburn C; Obersteiner M; Yamagata Y | |
| 发表日期 | 2005 |
| 出处 | Climate Policy 4 (4): 347-357 |
| 出版年 | 2005 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | Kagan (2002) argues that the different responses of Europeans and Americans to major strategic and international challenges is not simply due to differences in the current administrations, but rather results from (i) a power gap and (ii) differing ideologies. This article applies Kagan's theory to climate policy, employing terrorism policy as a point of comparison. We argue that the power gap between Europe and America is unable to explain the differences in climate policy. In contrast, the ideology gap may indeed have some explanatory value. Furthermore, we argue that one additional feature is critical - the costs and benefits imposed by climate change and terrorism prevention, and the process by which such costs and benefits are evaluated, differ between America and Europe. |
| 主题 | Forestry (FOR) ; Greenhouse Gas Initiative (GGI) |
| 关键词 | Climate policy International negotiations Kyoto Protocol Power and weakness Terrorism Transatlantic divide |
| URL | http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/7481/ |
| 来源智库 | International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/128443 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Ceronsky M,Hepburn C,Obersteiner M,et al. Clashing strategic cultures and climate policy.. 2005. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
