Ann Marlowe, a visiting fellow at the Hudson Institute, has a provocative op-ed in the Wall Street Journal today debunking common myths about military demographics. In an attention-grabbing lead, she writes:
Marlowe proceeds to rip apart these assumptions, relying on data collected by the Heritage Foundation. (For those skeptical about Heritage’s findings, take a look at this column by Washington Post ombudsman Deborah Howell, this study by military scholars David and Mady Segal [p. 24], this study by RAND researcher Beth Asch [p. 10], or DOD’s own numbers. They all tell the same story.) So why do these myths persist? Marlowe suggests one explanation:
Marlowe is right that urbanites have little contact with the military, but that detachment is as much a result of the withdrawal of the military from urban areas and the Northeast. As my colleague Gary Schmitt and I noted in another WSJ op-ed, current recruiting policy means that military service is essentially left to the imaginations of city youths. It shouldn’t surprise us that what they imagine is so far from the truth.
Anti-monopoly is the latest, greatest solution to all things wrong with the US economy. But reducing corporate concentration appears to be a solution in search of a problem, at least for now.
|