G2TT
来源类型Research Reports
规范类型报告
ISBN9780833079091
来源IDRR-172-A
Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills for Army Leaders Using Blended-Learning Methods
Susan G. Straus; Michael G. Shanley; Maria C. Lytell; James C. Crowley; Sarah H. Bana; Megan Clifford; Kristin J. Leuschner
发表日期2013
出版年2013
页码168
语种英语
结论

Students Were Generally Satisfied with the Course

  • The majority of students felt that AOC-BDL achieved its core purpose. Most were satisfied with computer-based instruction, instruction of operational topics, and aspects of the learning environment, such as instruction quality and peer interaction and feedback.

Students Noted that the Distributed Environment Posed Challenges to Meeting Course Goals

  • Students reported that computer-supported collaborative learning impeded some course goals, particularly for complex topics, such as the military decision making process. Students also cited challenges to group coordination due to technology reliability and access, competing commitments, and difficulties working across time zones.

Although Many Blended-Learning Courses Have a Face-to-Face Component, In-Person Instruction May Not Be Possible in all Situations

  • Adding a resident segment to AOC-BDL may offer the greatest potential for improvement and is consistent with student preferences and best practices. However, this option may not be feasible due to available infrastructure, costs, and operational manning requirements. Consequently, other strategies become particularly important to consider.

Cases Studies of BDL and Related Research Point to Best Practices and Options for Improvement

  • Successful BDL programs find ways to reduce conflicts with students' other commitments. Two strategies include limiting the use of synchronous modalities and engaging students' employers to dedicate time for students' coursework. Instructors use a variety of approaches to engage students and foster success in virtual collaboration, including training students in use of course technology, scaffolding discussions, providing timely feedback, limiting group size for interactive activities, and using peer evaluations to increase accountability in teams.
主题Educational Technology ; Military Education and Training ; Military Officers ; Organizational Leadership Development ; United States Army
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR172.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/107491
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Susan G. Straus,Michael G. Shanley,Maria C. Lytell,et al. Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills for Army Leaders Using Blended-Learning Methods. 2013.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
1374062418763.gif(6KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
RAND_RR172.pdf(694KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Susan G. Straus]的文章
[Michael G. Shanley]的文章
[Maria C. Lytell]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Susan G. Straus]的文章
[Michael G. Shanley]的文章
[Maria C. Lytell]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Susan G. Straus]的文章
[Michael G. Shanley]的文章
[Maria C. Lytell]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: 1374062418763.gif
格式: GIF
文件名: RAND_RR172.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。