G2TT
来源类型Research Reports
规范类型报告
ISBN9780833081520
来源IDRR-321-A
Developing Army Leaders: Lessons for Teaching Critical Thinking in Distributed, Resident, and Mixed-Delivery Venues
Susan G. Straus; Michael G. Shanley; James C. Crowley; Douglas Yeung; Sarah H. Bana; Kristin J. Leuschner
发表日期2014
出版年2014
页码134
语种英语
结论

Students in All Venues Were Generally Satisfied with the Common Core — The First Phase of the U.S. Army's System for Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Its Officer Corps

  • Students were generally satisfied with most aspects of the course in all venues.
  • However, students engaged in online instruction were less satisfied with opportunities for performance feedback and wanted more peer interaction.
  • Students reported technical and administrative problems with some aspects of online instructional delivery.

Student Grades Were High Across All Venues; Grading Needs Improvement

  • There were no meaningful differences in grades across venues.
  • The average scores on assignments suggest that there was leniency in grading.
  • The authors conducted an exploratory, quasi-experimental study to assess the consistency of grading among faculty on four assignments. Although the number of faculty who participated in the study was small, responses of those who did participate showed that reliability across these graders was generally quite low.

Future Evaluation Should Focus on Whether the Best Possible Outcomes Within Venues, Rather Than Equivalent Outcomes Across Venues, Are Achieved

  • The authors found few meaningful differences in students' self-assessed learning and course grades among the three venues.
  • These results should not be interpreted to mean that the venues are equally effective or that differences do not exist.
  • Although the learning goals are the same, the venues are designed to support different student environments and needs.
摘要

The Command and General Staff School (CGSS) should continue to examine grading practices and, if needed, provide professional development to ensure that faculty grade to a common standard.

CGSS should investigate the use of blended learning strategies, such as those used in their Advanced Operations Course, to provide Advanced Distributed Learning students with opportunities for instructor and peer interaction.

CGSS should address technical issues with access to and functions of online courseware. The demands of Phase II on The Army School System students also warrant further investigation, along with consideration of mitigation strategies such as changes in course structure.

Surveys used in the Common Core should be modified to obtain more diagnostic information:

  • Assess self-efficacy questions before and after training in combination with individual-level explanatory variables to assess training effectiveness.
  • Move from five- to six-point response options for close-ended questions to increase variability in responses.
  • Analyze responses to open-ended questions to better understand students' experiences in the course and to improve future surveys.

Use web analytics, such as time spent on online lessons, to assess student behavior in the course and its association with performance in training.

CGSS should survey course graduates and their supervisors to assess the impact of training on subsequent job performance.

主题Educational Program Evaluation ; Educational Technology ; Military Education and Training ; Military Officers
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR321.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/107641
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Susan G. Straus,Michael G. Shanley,James C. Crowley,et al. Developing Army Leaders: Lessons for Teaching Critical Thinking in Distributed, Resident, and Mixed-Delivery Venues. 2014.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
1398708696648.gif(3KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
RAND_RR321.pdf(1143KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Susan G. Straus]的文章
[Michael G. Shanley]的文章
[James C. Crowley]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Susan G. Straus]的文章
[Michael G. Shanley]的文章
[James C. Crowley]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Susan G. Straus]的文章
[Michael G. Shanley]的文章
[James C. Crowley]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: 1398708696648.gif
格式: GIF
文件名: RAND_RR321.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。