G2TT
来源类型Research Reports
规范类型报告
来源IDRR-527-1-WFHF
Evaluation of the Population and Poverty Research Initiative (PopPov)
Julie DaVanzo; Sebastian Linnemayr; Peter Glick; Eric Apaydin
发表日期2014
出版年2014
页码150
语种英语
结论

The Program Has Increased Numbers of Economists Doing Research on PopPov Priority Topics but Not of Senior Researchers or an Emphasis on Economics

  • PopPov has increased the number of economists working on PopPov issues, although many of these were already working on these topics or, in the case of the fellows, intended to work on them. The initiative has not brought many new senior researchers into the field. The program has enabled researchers already in the field to do more than they may have been able to do without PopPov funding. It has also increased the number of European researchers working on population, health, and development topics.

Published Papers Do Not Proportionately Focus on PopPov Areas of Emphasis

  • Many papers prepared for PopPov are not on one of PopPov's primary research questions. The majority of fellows and researchers supported are economists, but only 25 percent of the journal articles supported by PopPov are in economics journals.

PopPov Research Does Not Appear to Be Reaching Economic Policymakers to Influence Policy Decisions

  • Relatively few researchers assigned a high priority to translating their research into policy messages or presenting their findings at forums likely to be attended by policymakers.
  • Many who could potentially use PopPov findings in their policy, communication, or advocacy work have little, if any, awareness of PopPov and the research it has supported.
摘要
  • Prioritize objectives; design strategies to achieve them. Establish a standing steering or advisory committee. Look for niches for which there is not already funding available.
  • Direct topics to be addressed. Encourage applicants to propose the types of data and methods that are most appropriate for their research questions. Consider awarding some larger and longer-term grants.
  • Include more reviewers of research proposals with policy and program experience. Give more weight to policy relevance in making project funding decisions. Continue stakeholder meetings. Have fellows and junior researchers work on approaches to problems designed with policymakers' help.
  • Prioritize research proposals that include training components.
  • Prioritize fellowship applicants from SSA and others from developing countries who are not U.S. citizens or permanent residents. Include a former PopPov fellow on the selection committee. Include training on policy communication as part of PopPov fellowships.
  • Try to attract high-quality applications from African students and scholars. Bring African fellows to receive training in the United States or Canada and continue mentorship after returning home.
  • Continue PopPov conferences; have them focus more on findings than on methodology, and focus them more topic-wise. Continue poster sessions; enable more networking. Make clear each session's topic and target audience; publish conference proceedings. Have some discussants from outside the network. Hold a conference in the United States and at different times of year. Establish formal links with meetings of related groups.
  • Mention PopPov more prominently on the Population Reference Bureau website. Update the PopPov website and make it more appropriate for non-researchers. Make briefs more appropriate for policy audiences. Disseminate them broadly.
主题Africa ; Demographics ; Developing Countries ; Economic Policy ; Family Planning ; Populations
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR527-1.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/107798
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Julie DaVanzo,Sebastian Linnemayr,Peter Glick,et al. Evaluation of the Population and Poverty Research Initiative (PopPov). 2014.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
x1495316359755.jpg(4KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
RAND_RR527-1.pdf(728KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Julie DaVanzo]的文章
[Sebastian Linnemayr]的文章
[Peter Glick]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Julie DaVanzo]的文章
[Sebastian Linnemayr]的文章
[Peter Glick]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Julie DaVanzo]的文章
[Sebastian Linnemayr]的文章
[Peter Glick]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: x1495316359755.jpg
格式: JPEG
文件名: RAND_RR527-1.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。