G2TT
来源类型Research Reports
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR657
来源IDRR-657-CMS
Hospice Experience of Care Survey: Development and Field Test
Rebecca Anhang Price; Denise D. Quigley; Melissa A. Bradley; Joan M. Teno; Layla Parast; Marc N. Elliott; Ann C. Haas; Brian D. Stucky; Brianne Mingura; Karl Lorenz
发表日期2014
出版年2014
页码75
语种英语
结论

The Survey Field Test Revealed Differences in Response Rates

  • The overall field test response rate was 53.6 percent. Spouses and parents of hospice decedents were more likely to respond than children, those who were mailed the Family Evaluation of Hospice Care (FEHC) survey were less likely to respond, caregivers of older decedents were more likely to respond than those of younger decedents, and caregivers of Hispanic decedents were less likely to respond than those of decedents in other race or ethnicity categories.

The Analysis Identified Nine Measures

  • Psychometric analyses identified six multi-item composites and three single-item indicators: Hospice Team Communication (five items), Getting Timely Care (two items), Treating Your Family Member with Respect (two items), Providing Emotional Support (two items), Getting Help for Symptoms (two items), Hospice Care Training (home setting only) (four items), Information Continuity (1 item), Support for Religious and Spiritual Beliefs (one item), and Understanding the Side Effects of Pain Medication (one item).

An Adjustment Model Is Recommended for National Implementation

  • The recommended case-mix adjustment model includes language of completed survey, decedent age, decedent education, decedent sex, payer type (all categories), primary diagnosis (all categories), respondent age, respondent education, respondent sex, language spoken at home (all categories), relationship to decedent (all categories), and prior receipt of FEHC survey. The model should be further examined and evaluated in national implementation.

Overall, Survey Respondents in the Field Test Seem Satisfied with Hospice Care

  • The mean overall rating of hospice care was 93.0 out of 100. Mean scores for each composite were generally high, ranging from 81.0 for Understanding the Side Effects of Pain Medication and 85.2 for Hospice Care Training to 94.9 for Information Continuity and 95.7 for Treating Your Family Member with Respect.
主题Health Care Quality Measurement ; Hospice Care ; Patient Experience ; Survey Research Methodology
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR657.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/107865
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Rebecca Anhang Price,Denise D. Quigley,Melissa A. Bradley,et al. Hospice Experience of Care Survey: Development and Field Test. 2014.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
x1518038281935.jpg(4KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
RAND_RR657.pdf(464KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Rebecca Anhang Price]的文章
[Denise D. Quigley]的文章
[Melissa A. Bradley]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Rebecca Anhang Price]的文章
[Denise D. Quigley]的文章
[Melissa A. Bradley]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Rebecca Anhang Price]的文章
[Denise D. Quigley]的文章
[Melissa A. Bradley]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: x1518038281935.jpg
格式: JPEG
文件名: RAND_RR657.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。