G2TT
来源类型Research Reports
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR381
ISBN9780833082657
来源IDRR-381-A
Toppling the Taliban: Air-Ground Operations in Afghanistan, October 2001–June 2002
Walter L. Perry; David Kassing
发表日期2015
出版年2015
页码182
语种英语
结论

Joint action at the lowest echelons proved effective in Afghanistan

  • Air-land operations were effective both in the initial campaign to destroy the Taliban regime and in the ensuing hunt for the remnants of al Qaeda and the Taliban.

The type and scale of operations in Afghanistan were unanticipated and were conducted in a harsh, demanding environment.

  • At the time, existing support locations were far away, and Afghanistan lacked the infrastructure to support the necessary logistics sustainment effort.
  • A flexible information system helped ensure that supply systems supporting operations in Afghanistan were able to adapt quickly and respond to rapid and frequent changes in supply delivery points.

Unmanned aerial vehicles proved their worth in Afghanistan.

  • The success of the Predator and Global Hawk UAVs prompted the services to modify and expand their plans for UAVs.

Coordination of special operations forces (SOF) and conventional forces caused some problems.

  • SOF often depend on air support for their very survival, yet they were not well integrated with tactical air controllers.
  • SOF learned how to call in air support but were not versed in air platforms and weapons. For this, they depended on tactical air control parties, but there were not enough of these at their home stations to meet all requirements, neither were they adequately equipped to support SOF.

The initial focus of the Coalition Joint Civil-Military Operations Task Force on humanitarian aid delayed it from providing more traditional civil affairs assistance.

  • Tension existed between its mandate to carry out aid and assistance projects and the desire to limit the number of U.S. forces in Afghanistan.
  • Additionally, it would have been helpful to deploy civil affairs troops in theater early, but the active force has relatively little civil affairs force structure.

Light forces played a dominant role in Afghanistan because of an elusive enemy operating in rugged terrain.

  • The Army's Special Forces played a central role in toppling the Taliban and hunting for al Qaeda.
  • Coalition forces frequently relied on helicopters to negotiate Afghanistan's difficult terrain.
  • The Army's light infantry and air-mobile forces were also well suited to operations in Afghanistan. Ultimately, only dismounted infantry could pursue al Qaeda into its mountainous lairs.
  • The Army could not have accomplished its mission in Afghanistan without light forces, both special operations and conventional forces.
摘要
  • The Army, in partnership with the other services, must plan and train for joint operations at the brigade and battalion task force level, with air support being pushed to company level and lower.
  • Due to the distance from existing support locations and the lack of local infrastructure to support the necessary logistics sustainment effort, OEF revealed the Army's need to improve its readiness to deploy and fight in an austere theater.
  • As the Army tailors its support doctrine, it should account for the possibility of supporting a theater where special operations forces mix with conventional forces.
  • The Army should continue to pursue its plans to develop tactical unmanned aerial vehicles.
  • The Army should develop coordination measures to ensure that conventional forces and special operations forces work together more smoothly and train together on a more regular basis.
  • Given its ongoing and likely future role in Afghanistan, the Army should restructure its humanitarian assistance organizations and clarify the Army's humanitarian assistance mission.
  • The Army's operational concepts should assume a continued risk of tactical surprise.
主题Afghanistan ; Civil-Military Relations ; Military Strategy ; September 11 ; 2001 Terrorist Attacks ; United States Air Force ; United States Army
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR381.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/107936
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Walter L. Perry,David Kassing. Toppling the Taliban: Air-Ground Operations in Afghanistan, October 2001–June 2002. 2015.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
x1495315139334.jpg(9KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
RAND_RR381.pdf(3904KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Walter L. Perry]的文章
[David Kassing]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Walter L. Perry]的文章
[David Kassing]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Walter L. Perry]的文章
[David Kassing]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: x1495315139334.jpg
格式: JPEG
文件名: RAND_RR381.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。