G2TT
来源类型Research Reports
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR1178
ISBN9780833091895
来源IDRR-1178-OSD
Metrics to Compare Aircraft Operating and Support Costs in the Department of Defense
Michael Boito; Edward G. Keating; John Wallace; Bradley DeBlois; Ilana Blum
发表日期2015
出版年2015
页码72
语种英语
结论

Cost per Flying Hour (CPFH) Metric Is Multidimensional and Used by DoD in Different Ways

  • CPFH is a metric widely used by the military services for different purposes, such as for flying-hour programs (FHP), for flying-hour reimbursable billing rates, and to compare O&S costs of different aircraft programs.
  • The key difference between CPFH used for FHP and reimbursable billing and the CPFH used to compare O&S costs of different aircraft programs is that cross-system O&S comparisons intentionally include some categories that are fixed (i.e., do not vary with flying hours).

O&S Cost per Aircraft Is Alternative Affordability Metric to CPFH in Comparing O&S Costs of Different Aircraft

  • The CPFH metric can behave counterintuitively: When flying hours are reduced, total program costs are reduced, but cost per flight hour can increase.
  • Decisionmakers could use CPFH to compare O&S costs of different aircraft when the appropriate standardization steps mentioned in the report are taken.
  • Comparisons of CPFH are most appropriate when the intention is to compare costs that vary closely with flying hours, such as fuel, depot-level reparables, or perhaps engine-related costs.
  • O&S costs will include elements that are largely fixed or insensitive to changes in flying hours — such as unit-level personnel, sustaining support, or modifications.
摘要
  • The operating-and-support (O&S) costs included in the comparison should be clearly defined.
  • All the direct elements of the standard O&S cost-element structure should be included when comparing O&S costs.
  • Indirect costs should be excluded because, as their name implies, these costs are only indirectly affected by the aircraft, and because they are not captured consistently by the services' official O&S cost databases.
  • A consistent measure of the number of flying hours per aircraft should be used when comparing costs of different aircraft. Costs of fleets should be compared using stable annual flying-hour levels needed to achieve crew proficiency and exclude flying hours for contingency operations, because variations in flying hours per aircraft affect the calculations.
  • Basic data-normalization steps will be needed when comparing O&S costs of different aircraft. Costs should be compared using constant dollars to normalize for the effects of inflation at different points in time.
  • Account for differences in actual costs versus estimated costs.
  • Primary aircraft inventory (PAI) should be used as the measure of the number of aircraft when an annual O&S cost-per-aircraft metric is used.
主题Maintenance ; Repair ; and Overhaul ; Military Aircraft ; Military Budgets and Defense Spending ; United States Air Force
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1178.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/107978
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Michael Boito,Edward G. Keating,John Wallace,et al. Metrics to Compare Aircraft Operating and Support Costs in the Department of Defense. 2015.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
x1495316221606.jpg(5KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
RAND_RR1178.pdf(346KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Michael Boito]的文章
[Edward G. Keating]的文章
[John Wallace]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Michael Boito]的文章
[Edward G. Keating]的文章
[John Wallace]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Michael Boito]的文章
[Edward G. Keating]的文章
[John Wallace]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: x1495316221606.jpg
格式: JPEG
文件名: RAND_RR1178.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。