G2TT
来源类型Research Reports
规范类型报告
ISBN9780833087935
来源IDRR-676-AF
Precision and Purpose: Airpower in the Libyan Civil War
Karl P. Mueller; Gregory Alegi; Christian F. Anrig; Christopher S. Chivvis; Robert Egnell; Christina Goulter; Camille Grand; Deborah C. Kidwell; Richard O. Mayne; Bruce R. Nardulli; et al.
发表日期2015
出版年2015
页码466
语种英语
结论

Airpower Prevented an Early Regime Victory

  • The air campaign enabled the opposition to survive Qaddafi's offensive in March 2011.
  • Imposition of the no-fly zone and the continuation of coalition air strikes had a profound effect on the Libyan rebels beyond the protection those strikes provided from air and ground attacks.

Airpower Enabled Rebels to Go on the Offensive

  • Aerial intervention made possible not merely a victory against Qaddafi, but a Libyan victory.
  • The availability of intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, especially of developed targets, was central to the conduct of the air campaign.

Intervention Was Done Cheaply and Effectively

  • No coalition personnel were killed, or even seriously wounded, carrying out operations over (or in) Libya.
  • Target planners and aircrews generally succeeded in their considerable efforts to avoid civilian casualties.
  • The war is estimated to have cost the coalition several billion dollars, a relatively low figure compared to other conflicts.
  • Several nations' air forces were stretched to the limit of their abilities to sustain aircraft deployments.

Airpower Was Intertwined With Politics

  • The Libyan aerial intervention was unusual in having a rationale that explicitly revolved around a mandate to protect civilians.
  • The Arab states' most important strategic contribution was in the political domain and in providing assistance to the Libyan rebels.
  • The United Nations' endorsement of the intervention heavily influenced the participation of some countries.
  • Applying the "Libya model" of using airpower to enable victories by indigenous ground forces to other settings is potentially powerful but will often be more difficult, especially where political conditions are less favorable than in Libya.
摘要
  • Develop provisions among NATO countries to enhance their ability to operate as an alliance within ever-changing coalitions, anticipating that it will be hard to predict the roster of players in some future endeavors.
  • Prepare to deal with the unanticipated absence of significant allies.
  • Build capabilities for cooperation with indigenous forces, which is all-important in cases such as Libya and should be first among many areas of further investigation into improving strategies and techniques for aerial interventions.
  • Develop standardized procedures and templates for information sharing (to include classification protocols) with "'NATO-plus"' partners to ease transition and integration issues.
  • Invest in munitions with limited kinetic effects, such as Brimstone, which demonstrated their worth in Libya.
  • For non-U.S. members, plan to address shortfalls in available capacity for air refueling, suppression of enemy air defenses, intelligence/surveillance/reconnaissance collection and analysis, and other "enabling" functions that the United States predominantly contributed to the Libya campaign.
  • Recognizing what airpower cannot do — and communicating this effectively to national leaders — is as important as envisioning what it can do.
主题Air Warfare ; Belgium ; Canada ; Denmark ; France ; Italy ; Libya ; Military Airlift ; Military Force Deployment ; Netherlands ; North Atlantic Treaty Organization ; Norway ; Qatar ; Sweden ; United Arab Emirates ; United Kingdom ; United States Air Force
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR676.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/108040
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Karl P. Mueller,Gregory Alegi,Christian F. Anrig,et al. Precision and Purpose: Airpower in the Libyan Civil War. 2015.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
x1495316284536.jpg(10KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
RAND_RR676.pdf(9716KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Karl P. Mueller]的文章
[Gregory Alegi]的文章
[Christian F. Anrig]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Karl P. Mueller]的文章
[Gregory Alegi]的文章
[Christian F. Anrig]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Karl P. Mueller]的文章
[Gregory Alegi]的文章
[Christian F. Anrig]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: x1495316284536.jpg
格式: JPEG
文件名: RAND_RR676.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。