G2TT
来源类型Research Reports
规范类型报告
ISBN9780833088697
来源IDRR-866-OSD
Defense Working Capital Fund Pricing in the Defense Finance and Accounting Service: A Useful, but Limited, Tool
Edward G. Keating; Ellen M. Pint; Christina Panis; Michael H. Powell; Sarah H. Bana
发表日期2015
出版年2015
页码64
语种英语
结论

Advantages of DWCF Pricing for DFAS

  • By rewarding customers with lower prices when they switch to automated approaches, DWCF pricing encourages customers to limit their burden on DFAS.
  • DWCF pricing encourages ongoing cost-related dialog both within DFAS and between DFAS and its customers.
  • Being a DWCF entity provides greater managerial flexibility to DFAS than if it were solely dependent on direct appropriations. For example, it can meet increased demands without requesting additional appropriations and can continue to operate during a budget sequester.

Disadvantages of DWCF Pricing for DFAS

  • The DWCF structure appears to impose greater cost accounting burden than would a direct appropriation mechanism, because DFAS has to attribute its costs to specific outputs.
  • DFAS customers may be developing skepticism about the actual consequences of their cost-saving steps, suspecting that DFAS simply recovers the costs in other ways.

Additional Options

  • An aggressive reform that would change DFAS's incentive structure considerably would be to modify DoD policy to allow other governmental or private-sector providers to compete with DFAS for DoD business.
  • DoD policy could allow the services themselves to create internal, within-service competition with DFAS. However, in light of DFAS's fixed costs, the current pricing structure cannot accommodate DFAS facing such competition.
摘要
  • A return to complete reliance on direct appropriations is probably an overreaction to DWCF pricing problems. The authors suggest, instead, that DFAS reform prices (e.g., nonlinear pricing) rather than eliminate them.
  • DoD decisionmakers and DFAS customers would benefit from greater visibility into DFAS's cost structure. DFAS was unable to provide the RAND research team with information about how indirect costs were allocated and how DFAS costs were divided by customer.
  • DFAS should experiment with pilot projects to better understand the implementation challenges, costs, and ultimate consequences of a nonlinear pricing approach.
主题Banking and Financial Services ; Military Budgets and Defense Spending ; Military Logistics
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR866.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/108097
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Edward G. Keating,Ellen M. Pint,Christina Panis,et al. Defense Working Capital Fund Pricing in the Defense Finance and Accounting Service: A Useful, but Limited, Tool. 2015.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
x1495316342767.jpg(5KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
RAND_RR866.pdf(257KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Edward G. Keating]的文章
[Ellen M. Pint]的文章
[Christina Panis]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Edward G. Keating]的文章
[Ellen M. Pint]的文章
[Christina Panis]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Edward G. Keating]的文章
[Ellen M. Pint]的文章
[Christina Panis]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: x1495316342767.jpg
格式: JPEG
文件名: RAND_RR866.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。