全球智库信息集成服务系统(G2TT): The Potential of Blind Collaborative Justice: Testing the Impact of Expert Blinding and Consensus Building on the Validity of Forensic Testimony

G2TT

来源类型	Research Reports
规范类型	报告
来源ID	RR-804-1-NIJ
	The Potential of Blind Collaborative Justice: Testing the Impact of Expert Blinding and Consensus Building on the Validity of Forensic Testimony
	Carolyn Wong; Eyal Aharoni; Gursel Rafig oglu Aliyev; Jacqueline Du Bois
发表日期	2015
出版年	2015
页码	39
语种	英语
结论	Expert Consensus Feedback Resulted in Improved Performance Expert consensus feedback regarding the correct response to the reasoning problem demonstrated the predicted significant effect on response errors: Delivery of feedback resulted in improved performance. An Advantage Due to Blinding Was Not Observed There was modest evidence that an expert's mere knowledge of the hiring counsel (prosecution vs. defense) could influence probabilistic reasoning. Increased accuracy tended to be higher in the party least favored by the evidence (the defense, in this case), suggesting a greater motivation to evaluate the evidence critically. However, there was no conclusive evidence that blinding experts to their party representation conferred an advantage — accuracy within this condition was only marginally greater than the prosecution condition and not greater than that of the defense.
摘要	Much more research is needed to demonstrate the real-world utility and feasibility of expert blinding. To the extent that this study's results can be replicated in more naturalistic trial settings, it suggests that greater focus on common threats to sound scientific reasoning (such as base rate neglect) and engagement of the broader scientific community could improve the validity of expert testimony in court cases. In addition, the effect of expert consensus exposure suggests that expert consensus feedback could be a promising way to reduce individual error in expert testimony. Future research is needed to confirm the effect of consensus exposure and to address practical and fairness issues associated with implementing expert consensus exposure approaches in a criminal justice environment.
主题	Civil Law ; Criminal Justice ; Criminal Law ; Delphi Method ; Expert Evidence
URL	https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR804-1.html
来源智库	RAND Corporation (United States)
资源类型	智库出版物
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/108100
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Carolyn Wong,Eyal Aharoni,Gursel Rafig oglu Aliyev,et al. The Potential of Blind Collaborative Justice: Testing the Impact of Expert Blinding and Consensus Building on the Validity of Forensic Testimony. 2015.

条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小	资源类型	版本类型	开放类型	使用许可
x1495316343762.jpg（4KB）	智库出版物		限制开放	CC BY-NC-SA	浏览
RAND_RR804-1.pdf（437KB）	智库出版物		限制开放	CC BY-NC-SA	浏览