G2TT
来源类型Research Reports
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR1297
ISBN9780833092052
来源IDRR-1297-AF
Improvements to Air Force Strategic Basing Decisions
Constantine Samaras; Rachel Costello; Paul DeLuca; Stephen J. Guerra; Kenneth Kuhn; Anu Narayanan; Michael Nixon; Stacie L. Pettyjohn; Nolan Sweeney; Joseph Vesely; et al.
发表日期2016
出版年2016
页码116
语种英语
结论

The Relative Influence of Basing Criteria

  • The Air Force makes basing decisions according to criteria that can generally be categorized into four categories: base attributes that affect the mission, whether the base has the current capacity to accommodate the proposed basing action, cost criteria that generally reflect regional economic factors, and environmental conditions that might inhibit accommodating the proposed mission.
  • The current basing process is designed so that installations with high mission scores are advanced toward site selection, but capacity scores largely influence the final candidate list.

Data Quality

  • Data used to make basing decisions are derived from authoritative sources.
  • Sources used to answer data call questions are consistent.
  • The auditability of underlying data used in the basing action process is weak. It is challenging to trace specific sources used to answer questions.
  • A majority of "data errors" may be unrelated to data quality and result from the data collection process or human error, or potentially both.

Role of Strategy in Basing Decisions

  • The Air Force and the U.S. government choose and maintain overseas bases principally for their strategic and diplomatic value, whereas decisions about domestic bases are driven by other criteria, such as access to training ranges, utilizing existing capacity, and satisfying political considerations.
  • The current domestic basing process does not include a portfolio-wide assessment of individual decisions or explicitly incorporate broader Air Force strategic concerns. The lack of strategic input is a post–Cold War phenomenon.
摘要
  • The Air Force should improve the auditability of the data used in basing decisions to allow for more efficient review by Headquarters Air Force. The combination of improved auditability and increased review should decrease the potential for human error in the basing decisionmaking process.
  • The Air Force should institute a process in which bases are initially screened for a basing action based on mission criteria, and then this smaller list of candidates is assessed on other criteria. This would save time and costs compared with the current process, in which all bases under consideration must provide data on all criteria.
主题Air Defense ; Air Warfare ; Base Realignment and Closure ; Civil-Military Relations ; Defense Infrastructure ; United States Air Force
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1297.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/108217
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Constantine Samaras,Rachel Costello,Paul DeLuca,et al. Improvements to Air Force Strategic Basing Decisions. 2016.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
x1495316193993.jpg(3KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
RAND_RR1297.pdf(1787KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Constantine Samaras]的文章
[Rachel Costello]的文章
[Paul DeLuca]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Constantine Samaras]的文章
[Rachel Costello]的文章
[Paul DeLuca]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Constantine Samaras]的文章
[Rachel Costello]的文章
[Paul DeLuca]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: x1495316193993.jpg
格式: JPEG
文件名: RAND_RR1297.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。