G2TT
来源类型Research Reports
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR1511
来源IDRR-1511-FIMT
Families Support to Transition: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
Susanne Sondergaard; Kate Cox; Erik Silfversten; Brent Anderson; Catherine Meads; Agnes Gereben Schaefer; Jody Larkin
发表日期2016
出版年2016
页码106
语种英语
结论

Examining the academic and grey literature on support to UK Service leaver families, the report finds that:

There was a shortage of UK literature on transition into civilian life.

  • Few studies were identified examining the transition from military to civilian life in the UK.
  • The literature on veterans and their families was focused mainly on the US experience, and the extent to which these findings apply in the UK context is not clear.
  • Source material was found to primarily focus on Service life, and especially on deployments.

Definitional gaps make comparisons challenging.

  • The available literature appeared to lack a common definition of key terms.
  • While the review aimed to discern whether sources were focused on 'Service life only', 'post-Service life only' or on 'both Service and post-Service life', ambiguous definitions of key terms including 'reintegration', 'transition' and 'veteran' meant that it was difficult to categorise this definitively.

The literature was characterised by a heavy health focus and with gaps across all four areas.

  • The review highlighted a heavy emphasis on health-related literature, with a particular focus on Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Intimate Partner Violence, and combat-related trauma.
  • However, the literature was lacking in the four review areas of interest: family engagement, family breakdown, housing support and spousal employment.
  • Key evidence gaps included a shortage of literature on 'non-traditional families', as well as limited research on the impact of Service on family stability more broadly.
摘要

Based on the evidence gaps identified, the following recommendations were developed for research funders and researchers:

  • More comparative longitudinal studies should be commissioned.
  • Evaluations should be allocated more funding.
  • Funding for a 'mapping study' of existing support for UK Service leavers should be made available.
  • Studies should clearly differentiate between different 'Service leaver types' and between family structures.

Recommendations were also developed for the UK Ministry of Defence (MOD):

  • The transferability of international research and programming should be considered when designing UK policy and support programmes.
  • The MOD should evaluate and monitor its transition support for UK Service leaver families.
主题Employment and Unemployment ; Military Families ; United Kingdom ; Veterans Education
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1511.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/108261
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Susanne Sondergaard,Kate Cox,Erik Silfversten,et al. Families Support to Transition: A Systematic Review of the Evidence. 2016.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
x1495316239569.jpg(8KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
RAND_RR1511.pdf(2814KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Susanne Sondergaard]的文章
[Kate Cox]的文章
[Erik Silfversten]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Susanne Sondergaard]的文章
[Kate Cox]的文章
[Erik Silfversten]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Susanne Sondergaard]的文章
[Kate Cox]的文章
[Erik Silfversten]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: x1495316239569.jpg
格式: JPEG
文件名: RAND_RR1511.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。