来源类型 | Research Reports
|
规范类型 | 报告
|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.7249/RR1511
|
来源ID | RR-1511-FIMT
|
| Families Support to Transition: A Systematic Review of the Evidence |
| Susanne Sondergaard; Kate Cox; Erik Silfversten; Brent Anderson; Catherine Meads; Agnes Gereben Schaefer; Jody Larkin
|
发表日期 | 2016
|
出版年 | 2016
|
页码 | 106
|
语种 | 英语
|
结论 |
Examining the academic and grey literature on support to UK Service leaver families, the report finds that:There was a shortage of UK literature on transition into civilian life.
- Few studies were identified examining the transition from military to civilian life in the UK.
- The literature on veterans and their families was focused mainly on the US experience, and the extent to which these findings apply in the UK context is not clear.
- Source material was found to primarily focus on Service life, and especially on deployments.
Definitional gaps make comparisons challenging.
- The available literature appeared to lack a common definition of key terms.
- While the review aimed to discern whether sources were focused on 'Service life only', 'post-Service life only' or on 'both Service and post-Service life', ambiguous definitions of key terms including 'reintegration', 'transition' and 'veteran' meant that it was difficult to categorise this definitively.
The literature was characterised by a heavy health focus and with gaps across all four areas.
- The review highlighted a heavy emphasis on health-related literature, with a particular focus on Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Intimate Partner Violence, and combat-related trauma.
- However, the literature was lacking in the four review areas of interest: family engagement, family breakdown, housing support and spousal employment.
- Key evidence gaps included a shortage of literature on 'non-traditional families', as well as limited research on the impact of Service on family stability more broadly.
|
摘要 |
Based on the evidence gaps identified, the following recommendations were developed for research funders and researchers:- More comparative longitudinal studies should be commissioned.
- Evaluations should be allocated more funding.
- Funding for a 'mapping study' of existing support for UK Service leavers should be made available.
- Studies should clearly differentiate between different 'Service leaver types' and between family structures.
Recommendations were also developed for the UK Ministry of Defence (MOD):- The transferability of international research and programming should be considered when designing UK policy and support programmes.
- The MOD should evaluate and monitor its transition support for UK Service leaver families.
|
主题 | Employment and Unemployment
; Military Families
; United Kingdom
; Veterans Education
|
URL | https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1511.html
|
来源智库 | RAND Corporation (United States)
|
引用统计 |
|
资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/108261
|
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 |
Susanne Sondergaard,Kate Cox,Erik Silfversten,et al. Families Support to Transition: A Systematic Review of the Evidence. 2016.
|
文件名:
|
x1495316239569.jpg
|
格式:
|
JPEG
|
文件名:
|
RAND_RR1511.pdf
|
格式:
|
Adobe PDF
|
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。