Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Research Reports |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.7249/RR1350 |
来源ID | RR-1350-NHSE |
Future evaluation of the Integrated Personal Commissioning programme: Mapping the logic and assessing evaluability | |
Megan Sim; Catherine L. Saunders; Eleanor Winpenny; Tom Ling | |
发表日期 | 2016 |
出版者 | RAND Corporation |
出版年 | 2016 |
页码 | 47 |
语种 | 英语 |
结论 | Within IPC there were three core streams of activity leading to desired outcomes.These three streams are around empowered individuals, sustainable commissioning and a vibrant market of providers. The main impact agreed across sites was the improved quality of life for patients and their carers. Reduced institutional and acute care, and more efficient use of money and resources, were also identified across sites as overall impacts for IPC. There are differences in how well prepared each site is for an evaluation.All are in a position to draw upon and adapt the generic theory of change model and therefore have a model that can be evaluated. However, each site has recognised that they are unlikely to get it right the first time and that they will want to adapt and improve their activities. |
摘要 |
|
主题 | Health Care Program Evaluation ; Integrative Medicine ; Patient Experience |
URL | https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1350.html |
来源智库 | RAND Corporation (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/108327 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Megan Sim,Catherine L. Saunders,Eleanor Winpenny,et al. Future evaluation of the Integrated Personal Commissioning programme: Mapping the logic and assessing evaluability. 2016. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
x1495316308721.jpg(4KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
RAND_RR1350.pdf(823KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。