全球智库信息集成服务系统

The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) Has Six Feasible Options for Educating Military-Connected Children at the 15 Installations

• It can preserve the status quo, transfer its responsibility to local educational agencies (LEAs), contract with LEAs, create coterminous school districts, establish charter schools, or contract with education management organizations.
• The authors found that the feasibility of the six options varied in general and sometimes from installation to installation. Preserving the status quo is feasible at every installation. Contracting with an LEA also appears to be feasible at every installation. Transfer to an LEA is apparently feasible at most installations, with some potential obstacles at Hanscom and Dover Air Force Bases, which have historically been served by special arrangements, and the installations in Kentucky, which lacks a precedent for educating on-base students. The other options have significant limitations or concerns about either legality or implementation, at some or all installations.

DoD Education Activity (DoDEA)–Operated Schools Generally Perform Above Average, While LEAs That Might Educate Military-Connected Students Generally Perform Below Average

• The schools operated by DoDEA generally perform above the national median on nationally normed standardized tests.
• LEAs that might receive military-connected students under transfer or contract options exist mostly in states with below-average performance on national tests, and the specific LEAs tend to rank below average within these states.

Transferring Schools to LEAs Would Save DoD Money, but LEAs Would Need Increased Funding

• Federal Impact Aid programs assist LEAs that educate federally connected students, such as military-connected students, because these LEAs cannot tax federal property to fund education. Although transferring schools to LEAs would save DoD money, LEAs would need increased funding from Impact Aid and other sources to fund the cost of educating the new students.