来源类型 | Research Reports
|
规范类型 | 报告
|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.7249/RR1476
|
ISBN | 9780833095961
|
来源ID | RR-1476-OSD
|
| Issues with Access to Acquisition Data and Information in the Department of Defense: A Closer Look at the Origins and Implementation of Controlled Unclassified Information Labels and Security Policy |
| Megan McKernan; Jessie Riposo; Jeffrey A. Drezner; Geoffrey McGovern; Douglas Shontz; Clifford A. Grammich
|
发表日期 | 2016
|
出版年 | 2016
|
页码 | 80
|
语种 | 英语
|
结论 |
Identifying Which Sensitive Unclassified Information in Defense Acquisition Requires Protection and How to Properly Protect It Through the Use of Appropriate Markings and Security Policy Can Be Problematic- The current environment in which acquisition data are protected and shared can be characterized by many organizations promulgating policy on overlapping and interrelated topics, policies that are relatively new and change frequently, and an ill-defined Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) policy. Those who originate the policies do not fund their implementation, meaning that a new or changed policy is effectively an unfunded requirement for information system managers.
- The authors were unable to find any single document that collects and describes the most commonly used CUI labels in the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. Some of these labels are legacy markings and practices that are not aligned with draft CUI policy. As a result, acquisition documentation with CUI may be mislabeled.
- Proprietary information (PROPIN) is a special class of CUI that relates to information and data developed by a private entity but shared with the government. Substantial confusion exists within DoD about what information is truly proprietary, who can have access to it, and how to grant access when needed. While there are some laws and policy that describe PROPIN, no single source describes the processes and procedures.
- Security policies tend to be one-size-fits-all, which does not reflect the unique characteristics of each information system. Originators of security policies do not fund their implementation, meaning that a new or changed policy is effectively an unfunded requirement for system managers.
|
摘要 |
- A more robust, central authoritative source for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) data labeling, access, and management (including monitoring and challenging document originators) should be established by the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (OUSD[AT&L]). The U.S. Department of Defense should also train its workforce on the new CUI labeling procedures when they are released and implemented.
- To define and establish proper handling procedures for CUI, a function (additional responsibility for a currently existing office with experience using a large number of CUI labels in multiple roles) and reference (a central, authoritative online resource that references all relevant guidance on information management, handling, access, and release for acquisition data) should be established within OUSD(AT&L).
|
主题 | Cyber and Data Sciences
; Military Acquisition and Procurement
; Military Information Technology Systems
; United States Department of Defense
|
URL | https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1476.html
|
来源智库 | RAND Corporation (United States)
|
引用统计 |
|
资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/108392
|
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 |
Megan McKernan,Jessie Riposo,Jeffrey A. Drezner,et al. Issues with Access to Acquisition Data and Information in the Department of Defense: A Closer Look at the Origins and Implementation of Controlled Unclassified Information Labels and Security Policy. 2016.
|