G2TT
来源类型Research Reports
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR1773
来源IDRR-1773-BMGF
Use of Open Educational Resources in an Era of Common Standards: A Case Study on the Use of EngageNY
Julia H. Kaufman; John S. Davis II; Elaine Lin Wang; Lindsey E. Thompson; Joseph D. Pane; Katherine Pfrommer; Mark Harris
发表日期2017
出版年2017
页码67
语种英语
结论

EngageNY is among the most commonly used curriculum materials for mathematics and English language arts (ELA).

  • EngageNY was heavily used in New York state during the period of our analysis, but materials were accessed across the country.
  • Teachers' use of EngageNY was particularly high in states that have adopted Common Core or similar standards.
  • EngageNY mathematics materials were used at three times the rate of ELA materials across the country. However, ELA teachers may have used EngageNY more comprehensively than mathematics teachers.

High use of EngageNY was at least partly driven by educators' desire to help students meet state standards.

  • Between 80 and 90 percent of teachers indicated that their district either required or recommended its use.
  • State standards and district assessments influenced ELA teachers' use of EngageNY more than their use of other materials.
  • While the open nature of EngageNY may encourage use, teachers did not cite "availability" more often as an influence for their use compared with other materials.

EngageNY gives students more opportunities to engage in standards-aligned practices compared with other materials.

  • Mathematics teachers were more likely to indicate that EngageNY provided their students with opportunities to explain and justify their work and address goals with equal time and intensity compared with their other main instructional materials.
  • ELA teachers were more likely to indicate that EngageNY provided their students with opportunities to read nonfiction texts of sufficient complexity and connect literacy instruction to other content, among other standards-aligned practices.
摘要
  • Given that state standards and districts appear to be such a large driver of the use of EngageNY, open educational resource (OER) providers — and any providers of online instructional materials — should ensure that their materials are clearly aligned with standards and provide evidence in that regard. In particular, if online materials are provided in progressions that are well-aligned with state standards progressions, teachers may be more apt to use those materials on an ongoing basis for their instruction, and districts could be more apt to recommend and require use of those materials.
  • Providers may consider offering additional tools that support implementation of OER across schools and districts. If adoption of online curriculum materials is district-wide, rather than represented by individual teachers, providers have an opportunity to leverage the curriculum implementation support that districts provide to teachers and the support teachers can provide to one another in professional learning networks.
  • States, districts, and others supporting teachers' work also have an important role in supporting use of OER. To get high-quality OER into the hands of teachers, rigorous vetting and review of curricula to examine alignment with standards and assessments could be performed by researchers, states, and other organizations. States, districts, and schools may also consider how to integrate the content of recommended curricula into professional learning opportunities on a regular basis and, perhaps more importantly, create and grow networks of expert users who can support each other through online and in-person professional learning communities.
主题Education Curriculum ; Educational Technology ; New York ; Standards-Based Education Reform ; STEM Education ; Students ; Teacher Training
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1773.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/108465
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Julia H. Kaufman,John S. Davis II,Elaine Lin Wang,et al. Use of Open Educational Resources in an Era of Common Standards: A Case Study on the Use of EngageNY. 2017.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
x1495297223029.jpg(9KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
RAND_RR1773.pdf(2866KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Julia H. Kaufman]的文章
[John S. Davis II]的文章
[Elaine Lin Wang]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Julia H. Kaufman]的文章
[John S. Davis II]的文章
[Elaine Lin Wang]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Julia H. Kaufman]的文章
[John S. Davis II]的文章
[Elaine Lin Wang]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: x1495297223029.jpg
格式: JPEG
文件名: RAND_RR1773.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。