G2TT
来源类型Research Reports
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR1233
来源IDRR-1233-A
Defining an Approach for Future Close Air Support Capability
John Matsumura; John Gordon IV; Randall Steeb
发表日期2017
出版年2017
页码36
语种英语
结论

Close Air Support (CAS) Backs up Troops on the Ground and Affects Morale

  • The A-10 operates at relatively low altitudes. It uses its 30mm cannons more frequently than any other weapon. These allow greater accuracy than bombs, which is of particular value when the troops being supported are in close proximity to the enemy.
  • Low-flying aircraft are also highly visible. This boosts friendly morale and intimidates enemies.
  • In recent conflicts, the air defenses have been unsophisticated, mostly consisting of small arms, rocket-propelled grenades, and some shoulder-fired missiles.

Other Assets that Perform the Mission, but There Are Drawbacks

  • The USAF has other options for performing the CAS mission, including F-15Es; F-16s; B-1s; and, soon, the F-35A.
  • Attack helicopters could provide CAS, but are, like all aircraft, also vulnerable at low altitudes.
  • Other alternatives include converting A-10s to remotely piloted aircraft or developing a specialized unmanned aerial vehicle for the purpose.

Costs Are an Additional Concern

  • The Air Force expects to save about $3.7 billion over the next five years.
  • But this does not account for the costs of conversions or alternative aircraft.
摘要
  • Given the importance of close air support (CAS) to joint operations, future CAS requirements should be carefully reexamined in much the same way they were before the A-10 was developed.
  • The current plan for CAS capabilities should be adopted if it can meet the CAS requirements that emerge from this process and if a cost-based analysis validates the cost reductions the Air Force envisions.
  • However, if the plan does not meet future CAS requirements or would cost more than alternatives that provide similar CAS capabilities, the current plan for providing CAS should be reconsidered.
  • Regardless of the outcome of the requirements reexamination process and the subsequent capabilities and cost-based analyses, we recommend fielding a viable replacement CAS capability before eliminating the capability the A-10 provides to minimize risk to ground forces.
主题Military Acquisition and Procurement ; Military Aircraft ; Military Tactics
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1233.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/108478
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
John Matsumura,John Gordon IV,Randall Steeb. Defining an Approach for Future Close Air Support Capability. 2017.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
x1495316195637.jpg(4KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
RAND_RR1233.pdf(649KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[John Matsumura]的文章
[John Gordon IV]的文章
[Randall Steeb]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[John Matsumura]的文章
[John Gordon IV]的文章
[Randall Steeb]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[John Matsumura]的文章
[John Gordon IV]的文章
[Randall Steeb]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: x1495316195637.jpg
格式: JPEG
文件名: RAND_RR1233.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。