G2TT
来源类型Research Reports
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR1201.1
ISBN9780833096470
来源IDRR-1201/1-SOJTF-A
Implications of the Security Cooperation Office Transition in Afghanistan for Special Operations Forces: An Abbreviated Report of the Study's Primary Findings
Jason H. Campbell; Richard S. Girven; Ben Connable; Jonah Blank; Raphael S. Cohen; Larry Hanauer; William Young; Linda Robinson; Sean Mann
发表日期2017
出版年2017
页码46
语种英语
结论

Working with the Interagency: Country Team

  • Regular coordination with the country team is essential.
  • Clear understanding among the country team of the various authorities that different elements are operating under prevents confusion and discord.
  • Rapport and trust building within the country team can pay great dividends for special operations forces (SOF) equities.
  • Space issues and limitations can be a limiting factor in certain instances.

Working with the Interagency: Stateside

  • A lack of precise and compatible strategic guidance to the ambassador and the SOF element can negatively affect planning within the country team.
  • The activities of Washington agencies, such as the Pentagon and State Department, as well as the combatant commands, influence relationships within the country team.

Working with the Host Nation

  • A formal agreement with the host/partner nation specifically outlining rules of engagement and expectations can help avoid misunderstandings and operational difficulties.
  • Building lasting bonds with host/partner-nation security officials can help smooth fluctuations in the bilateral relations between the governments.
  • Shifting from Title 10 to Title 22 authorities can create added strain with host/partner-nation authorities, who may not understand the distinction and may not be content with the changes involved.

Working within the SOF Community

  • Staffing program managers in the Security Cooperation Office (SCO) who have knowledge of SOF requirements is a good complement to the typical SOF operational liaison assigned to an embassy.
  • SOF personnel assigned to serve in an embassy should be provided appropriate predeployment training.
  • Trade-offs between Title 10 and Title 22 authorities exist: While the former typically experience greater freedom of movement, the latter tend to have better access to embassy facilities, funding, and logistical support.
  • The current cap on deployments for SOF personnel can make it difficult for personnel to mesh well with the rest of the country team.
主题Afghanistan ; Iraq ; Jordan ; Pakistan ; Philippines ; Security Cooperation ; Special Operations Forces ; Uganda
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1201z1.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/108535
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Jason H. Campbell,Richard S. Girven,Ben Connable,et al. Implications of the Security Cooperation Office Transition in Afghanistan for Special Operations Forces: An Abbreviated Report of the Study's Primary Findings. 2017.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
x1501596583549.jpg(7KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
RAND_RR1201z1.pdf(193KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Jason H. Campbell]的文章
[Richard S. Girven]的文章
[Ben Connable]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Jason H. Campbell]的文章
[Richard S. Girven]的文章
[Ben Connable]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Jason H. Campbell]的文章
[Richard S. Girven]的文章
[Ben Connable]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: x1501596583549.jpg
格式: JPEG
文件名: RAND_RR1201z1.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。