来源类型 | Research Reports
|
规范类型 | 报告
|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.7249/RR2099
|
ISBN | 9780833098993
|
来源ID | RR-2099-NIJ
|
| Knowing More, But Accomplishing What? Developing Approaches to Measure the Effects of Information-Sharing on Criminal Justice Outcomes |
| Brian A. Jackson; Lane F. Burgette; Caroline Stevens; Claude Messan Setodji; Erinn Herberman; Stephanie Ann Kovalchik; Katie Mugg; Meagan Cahill; Jessica Hwang; Joshua Lawrence Traub
|
发表日期 | 2017
|
出版年 | 2017
|
页码 | 74
|
语种 | 英语
|
结论 |
Measuring the Effects of Information-Sharing- Measuring the effects of information-sharing is not straightforward, because information is not being shared simply for the sake of sharing but with the intent of doing something else better. Many typical quantitative measures (e.g., amount of information shared by such systems) measure process or outputs, not necessarily the effect of sharing information.
- We teamed up with the Automated Regional Justice Information System (ARJIS) to provide a real-world case study in which to experiment with measuring the effects of different types of data-sharing. As part of this effort, we interviewed users of ARJIS information-sharing tools in various roles and agencies to identify how the ways that criminal justice practitioners performed their tasks would shape the challenge of measuring the effect of information-sharing on their efficiency or effectiveness.
- We also developed measures for three different types of sharing tools provided by ARJIS to its users. The measures examined the effect of ARJIS applications that made specific types of information more prominent for users, allowed sharing of information among groups of users, and offered tools to search cross-jurisdictional databases on the speed and likelihood of different law enforcement events, as well as the involvement of agencies with different jurisdictions in making arrests or managing specific types of offenders.
|
摘要 |
- Some of the biggest takeaways of this effort were lessons on how information systems could be designed to make this sort of analysis more straightforward by building in specific features or addressing key technical problems. These lessons would make it easier to replicate and expand on the criminal justice system's ability to link information-sharing to justice outcomes.
- Challenges we encountered included ways of addressing how differences in law enforcement practitioner roles and work structure would affect measurement and navigating technical challenges of cross-jurisdictional data integration, data quality issues, and other concerns.
- Among the key lessons learned were, first, for some of the system design issues, our results simply reemphasize the importance of initiatives that are already under way to facilitate sharing of data across agencies. Second, standardization across agencies, by agreeing on and adopting a unique identifier for individuals, would help address difficulties in tracking both criminal activity and actions to address that activity across jurisdictional lines. Third, where storage capabilities make it possible to do so, it would be valuable to retain more administrative data in justice information systems to enable evaluation efforts. Fourth, building system feedback mechanisms that link the use of specific data to outcomes would be an opportunity for systems to make themselves not only easier to assess but also, and more importantly, operationally useful.
|
主题 | Criminal Justice
; Cyber and Data Sciences
; Law Enforcement
|
URL | https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2099.html
|
来源智库 | RAND Corporation (United States)
|
引用统计 |
|
资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/108566
|
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 |
Brian A. Jackson,Lane F. Burgette,Caroline Stevens,et al. Knowing More, But Accomplishing What? Developing Approaches to Measure the Effects of Information-Sharing on Criminal Justice Outcomes. 2017.
|
文件名:
|
x1505479227656.jpg
|
格式:
|
JPEG
|
文件名:
|
RAND_RR2099.pdf
|
格式:
|
Adobe PDF
|
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。