G2TT
来源类型Research Reports
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR484
来源IDRR-484-AP
Evaluation of The Atlantic Philanthropies Migration Programme
Emma Disley; Daniel Schweppenstedde; Emily Scraggs; Jennifer Rubin; Ben Baruch
发表日期2017
出版年2017
页码77
语种英语
结论

The evaluation found that there was a more robust and professional network of organisations, working to achieve a common goal of improving the lives of migrants in Ireland in 2014 than in 2004.

  • This is evidence of the success of the 'field-building approach' taken by Atlantic, with a diverse range of actors pursuing a common goal over an extended period of time and combining a set of strategies targeting a variety of dimensions of the problem.

There had been a shift in grantee organisations from service delivery to policy advocacy and a more strategic approach to addressing the challenges faced by migrants.

  • The organisations that were funded all existed prior to the Migration Programme but at the end of 2014 they were more focused on advocacy than service delivery and case work.

While evidencing the impacts of advocacy is challenging, Atlantic grantees described numerous contributions to changes in practice, policy and law in Ireland that directly impacted the lives of migrants and asylum-seekers.

  • Some of these impacts — namely those that changed law — are clearly sustainable and long-term. Others — which changed policy — are not guaranteed to persist (since policy can be amended by future governments and administrations), but have directly improved the experience of migrants. Other impacts might yet be realized, as the effects of changes in law and policy take time to translate into day-to-day practice.
摘要

The report highlights promising practices for foundations and other grant-making organisations wishing to embark on a field-building approach, related to:

  • The use of multiannual core funding, approaches to supporting capacity-building within NGOs, and facilitating partnership and collaboration between civil society actors.
  • The way in which representatives from Atlantic developed relationships with grantees, were available to provide advice and guidance, and encouraged organisations to be open about problems and challenges.
  • Using strategic litigation, involving migrants in advocacy, communicating advocacy messages using interactive and innovative methods, and building collaborations that involved national and European organisations.
主题Civil Rights ; Community Organizations ; Immigration and Emigration ; Ireland ; Program Evaluation ; Refugees
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR484.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/108601
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Emma Disley,Daniel Schweppenstedde,Emily Scraggs,et al. Evaluation of The Atlantic Philanthropies Migration Programme. 2017.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
x1509972589237.jpg(7KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
RAND_RR484.pdf(1003KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Emma Disley]的文章
[Daniel Schweppenstedde]的文章
[Emily Scraggs]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Emma Disley]的文章
[Daniel Schweppenstedde]的文章
[Emily Scraggs]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Emma Disley]的文章
[Daniel Schweppenstedde]的文章
[Emily Scraggs]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: x1509972589237.jpg
格式: JPEG
文件名: RAND_RR484.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。