G2TT
来源类型Research Reports
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR1718.1
来源IDRR-1718/1-RC
The Energy Implications of Drones for Package Delivery: A Geographic Information System Comparison
Timothy R. Gulden
发表日期2017
出版年2017
页码23
语种英语
结论

Shifting smaller-package delivery from trucks to drones results in a net savings of 5.7 percent of the overall energy used.

  • We found that shifting 20 percent of delivery stops from trucks to drones would require 13 fewer truck routes, 468 fewer truck miles, and (assuming an efficiency of 10 miles per gallon) 46.8 fewer gallons of diesel fuel. The drone delivery would involve 1,550 drone trips, totaling 9,406 miles flown. Assuming a tilt-rotor fixed-wing design, other work in this project suggests a delivery drone fuel economy of 460 miles per gallon equivalent, allowing all the deliveries to be conducted with the energy equivalent of 20.4 gallons of diesel. This results in a savings of 26.4 gallons of diesel, for a net savings of about 5.7 percent.

Drones may be an energy-saving way to deliver light packages, although they are unlikely to replace trucks for heavier items.

  • The savings come primarily from the fact that trucks are vastly heavier than drones. By using drones to deliver only the lightest packages, the deliverer is able to free the truck, with its greater weight and additional cargo, from the additional driving required to deliver that small package. Reducing the number of service areas also reduces the amount of driving required for the trucks.
  • Drone energy use would be entirely electric. Depending on the sourcing of this power, it would be expected to have a much lower carbon footprint and to produce less local air pollution as well.
摘要
  • While the numbers and calculations in this preliminary study are rough, the analysis supports the idea that the energy requirements for truck and drone delivery for small packages are of the same order of magnitude and, thus, that shifting some deliveries to drones would not have a major impact on the energy intensity of package delivery. However, it would shift this energy from diesel-burning trucks to electric drones, which might have a beneficial impact on the carbon footprint of package delivery until the delivery truck fleet can be converted to lower-carbon fuels. While practical considerations of noise abatement and airspace restriction might reduce this efficiency somewhat, rapid advances in battery technology and drone design can be expected to produce more than offsetting increases in efficiency.
主题Civilian and Commercial Drones ; Energy Consumption ; Surface Transportation
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1718z1.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/108635
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Timothy R. Gulden. The Energy Implications of Drones for Package Delivery: A Geographic Information System Comparison. 2017.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
x1520277947618.jpg(3KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
RAND_RR1718z1.pdf(1509KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Timothy R. Gulden]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Timothy R. Gulden]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Timothy R. Gulden]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: x1520277947618.jpg
格式: JPEG
文件名: RAND_RR1718z1.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。