G2TT
来源类型Research Reports
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR2486
ISBN9781977400635
来源IDRR-2486-PLBFC
Promoting the Long-Term Sustainability and Viability of Universities in the Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education
Charles A. Goldman; Rita Karam; Mark Stalczynski; Katheryn Giglio
发表日期2018
出版者RAND Corporation
出版年2018
页码98
语种英语
结论

State System universities face significant challenges.

  • Enrollment is likely to be reduced because youth population is projected to drop in most of Pennsylvania. Students are paying a greater share of costs because state appropriations are limited and have declined. Opportunities to change are hindered by state regulations, inflexible faculty labor relations, and governance that is reportedly bureaucratic and places politics above system needs.

Challenges will continue to affect universities and students.

  • System enrollment has declined 13 percent between 2010 and 2016. As of 2016, 11 of the 14 State System universities are operating in deficit (although some of this effect may stem from 2015 changes in accounting rules for retiree pensions). Given the projected decline of the state's youth population, student costs could continue to rise, while services may continue to be curtailed or downsized.

Instead of university closures, there are five possible options for change.

  • Several of these options could affect the missions of the universities, accessibility and costs for students, and the sovereign immunity that currently protects the State System from lawsuits.
  • Several of these options could affect the missions of the universities, accessibility and costs for students, and the sovereign immunity that currently protects the State System from lawsuits. Option 1 is to keep the broad State System structure with improvements. It upgrades the existing system by modifying the governance structure to reallocate authority across the various system levels and freeing institutions from some state requirements.
  • Option 2 makes the changes in Option 1 and also consolidates the current 14 universities into a smaller number — perhaps five to eight — by merging State System universities in each region of the state and including at least one fiscally viable university in each merger.
  • Option 3 would eliminate the State System structure and convert the universities to state-related status. This option would be applied to the stronger universities or to weaker universities that could be merged with stronger ones prior to independence.
  • Option 4 places the State System and all its institutions under the management of a large state-related university, building on their strong performance, possibly for a defined period of time such as ten years.
  • Option 5 merges the State System universities into one or more of the state-related universities as branch campuses.
摘要
  • Understand the seriousness of the challenges and plan for major changes. Do not seek to close universities, but increase flexibility and responsiveness through one or more of the five options. Option 1 is unlikely to address long-term challenges; Options 2 to 5 may be more difficult to implement, but they are more likely to strengthen financially weak institutions and match staff size to enrollment trends.
  • Seek to develop a new structure with state-related universities. Pursue either Option 4 or 5 if large, state-related universities are willing.
  • If a new structure with state-related universities is not feasible, pursue other options, starting with Option 2 or 3. If those cannot be implemented, pursue Option 1.
  • Do not establish a statewide coordinating body, unless it is needed to implement a specific option. Most of the options probably do not justify establishment of a new statewide higher education body.
主题College-Bound Students ; Educational Facilities ; Educational Institutions ; Pennsylvania ; Postsecondary Education ; School Finance ; School Services
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2486.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/108758
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Charles A. Goldman,Rita Karam,Mark Stalczynski,et al. Promoting the Long-Term Sustainability and Viability of Universities in the Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education. 2018.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
x1524668012565.jpg(12KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
RAND_RR2486.pdf(1757KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Charles A. Goldman]的文章
[Rita Karam]的文章
[Mark Stalczynski]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Charles A. Goldman]的文章
[Rita Karam]的文章
[Mark Stalczynski]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Charles A. Goldman]的文章
[Rita Karam]的文章
[Mark Stalczynski]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: x1524668012565.jpg
格式: JPEG
文件名: RAND_RR2486.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。