来源类型 | Research Reports
|
规范类型 | 报告
|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.7249/RR2464
|
ISBN | 9781977400710
|
来源ID | RR-2464-OSD
|
| An Evaluation of the Department of Defense's Excess Property Program: Law Enforcement Agency Equipment Acquisition Policies, Findings, and Options |
| Aaron C. Davenport; Jonathan William Welburn; Andrew Lauland; Annelise Pietenpol; Marc Robbins; Erin Rebhan; Patricia Boren; K. Jack Riley
|
发表日期 | 2018
|
出版年 | 2018
|
页码 | 116
|
语种 | 英语
|
结论 |
Amount and value of transfers- In fiscal years (FYs) 2015 to 2017, over 2.2 million uncontrolled items (e.g., tools, office furniture) worth nearly $1.2 billion, and over 3,000 controlled items (e.g., drones, aircraft) worth nearly $775 million, were transferred to 2,790 state and local LEAs, 174 federal LEAs, and 22 tribal LEAs.
- LEAs requisition more uncontrolled property than controlled property.
Types of items transferred- From hand warmers to laptops to rifles, over 7,000 unique types of items were transferred to LEAs through the LESO program in FYs 2015 to 2017.
- The authors found no clear relationship between LEA size and equipment acquisitions, though nearly two-thirds of mine-resistant ambush protected vehicles were acquired by LEAs with fewer than 100 sworn officers.
Suspensions and terminations- During FYs 2014 to 2016, there were 268 LEA suspensions and 24 LEA terminations from the program; the most frequent reasons were missing weapons, lack of compliance, and protracted issues regarding missing weapons.
DoD repurchase of "excess" equipment- Without access to all of DoD's purchasing data across all DoD components over the five-year period, a full analysis is not possible.
Program perceptions- LEA representatives generally endorse the program, citing the ability to obtain assets they might not be able to afford otherwise.
- Surveys using RAND's American Life Panel revealed that 48 percent of respondents were unaware of programs providing LEAs with excess military equipment and that 46 percent were in favor of limiting the equipment provided in some way.
|
摘要 |
- Maintain the status quo: We find that the LESO program is professionally managed, with some recurring issues, but overall there is appropriate attention to managing to congressional intent.
- Modify program emphasis and distribution of controlled equipment: Maintain the status quo with a few modifications, such as removing the emphasis on drug, border, and terrorism missions and ensuring that LESO is not the first provider of potentially controversial and high-visibility controlled equipment — though this would put a financial burden on smaller, less-resourced LEAs.
- Shift responsibility for controlled equipment to another organization: Move distribution approval and oversight responsibility from DLA to another organization — most likely the Department of Justice, which is better positioned to assess the impact of the program on policing.
|
主题 | Civil-Military Relations
; Military Equipment
; National Defense Authorization Act
; Police-Community Relations
; United States Department of Defense
|
URL | https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2464.html
|
来源智库 | RAND Corporation (United States)
|
引用统计 |
|
资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/108772
|
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 |
Aaron C. Davenport,Jonathan William Welburn,Andrew Lauland,et al. An Evaluation of the Department of Defense's Excess Property Program: Law Enforcement Agency Equipment Acquisition Policies, Findings, and Options. 2018.
|