G2TT
来源类型Research Reports
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR2165
ISBN9780833099419
来源IDRR-2165-A
Assessing, Monitoring, and Evaluating Army Security Cooperation: A Framework for Implementation
Angela O'Mahony; Ilana Blum; Gabriela Armenta; Nicholas Burger; Joshua Mendelsohn; Michael J. McNerney; Steven W. Popper; Jefferson P. Marquis; Thomas S. Szayna
发表日期2018
出版年2018
页码200
语种英语
结论
  • Army security cooperation generally favors three types of countries — those in need of greater engagement (e.g., countries with high domestic instability), those with which the United States would like to improve relations (e.g., countries with low political alignment with the United States), and those with which greater engagement will be most productive (e.g., stable democracies with strong military capability).
  • Army security cooperation activities align well with lessons learned from previous studies and have been found to contribute to effectiveness in both security cooperation and international development assistance.
  • Lack of systematic AM&E across Army security cooperation activities makes it impossible to examine whether, as a whole, previous activities met their objectives effectively.
  • International development agencies have developed methods for monitoring and evaluating its assistance activities that are calibrated to program and partner country needs and constraints. These strategies are relevant for Army AM&E.
  • Adopting a more strategic and analytically rigorous approach to security cooperation can improve the Army's ability to plan and evaluate security cooperation activities.
摘要
  • All security cooperation activities should involve some form of monitoring and evaluation, determined on a case-by-case basis.
  • Both qualitative and quantitative evaluation of security cooperation activities should be used for greater benefits.
  • Return on investment in learning should drive assessment, monitoring, and evaluation methods.
  • Strong collaboration with partner nations is crucial for effective AM&E.
主题Peacekeeping and Stability Operations ; Security Cooperation ; United States Army
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2165.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/108809
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Angela O'Mahony,Ilana Blum,Gabriela Armenta,et al. Assessing, Monitoring, and Evaluating Army Security Cooperation: A Framework for Implementation. 2018.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
x1532526268334.jpg(5KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
RAND_RR2165.pdf(1067KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Angela O'Mahony]的文章
[Ilana Blum]的文章
[Gabriela Armenta]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Angela O'Mahony]的文章
[Ilana Blum]的文章
[Gabriela Armenta]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Angela O'Mahony]的文章
[Ilana Blum]的文章
[Gabriela Armenta]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: x1532526268334.jpg
格式: JPEG
文件名: RAND_RR2165.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。