| 来源类型 | Research Reports
|
| 规范类型 | 报告
|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.7249/RR2639
|
| 来源ID | RR-2639-EAHSN
|
| Evaluating the impact of the Eastern Academic Health Science Network Transformation Support Unit |
| Miaoqing Yang; Jack Pollard; Bryn Garrod; Sonja Marjanovic; Jon Sussex
|
| 发表日期 | 2018
|
| 出版者 | RAND Corporation
|
| 出版年 | 2018
|
| 页码 | 62
|
| 语种 | 英语
|
| 结论 |
- Most survey respondents believe that the TSU has a positive impact on the outcomes of their projects, especially in helping them to reach more people and speeding up implementation of the innovation. Support for pilots, implementation and network building are particularly useful.
- There is room for improvement in terms of helping to identify scale-up opportunities and requirements, and creating an evidence base on impact to support shared learning and spread of good practice.
- Given its early stage, it is understandable that the TSU has not yet had much impact on NHS cost savings and the wider economy, and most respondents believe that these positive effects will come in the near future.
- From the four case studies we undertook, we do not have strong evidence to indicate the extent to which the TSU's inputs are necessary to achieve the potential beneficial impacts of supported interventions, or to achieve them to a greater extent or sooner than would otherwise have been the case. Such evidence should in principle be drawn from experimental or quasi-experimental studies with appropriate comparison groups that tell what would happen without support of the TSU. A weaker but more pragmatic approach would be future surveys of stakeholders to obtain their views on the additional impact (if any) brought about by the TSU's activities.
- The TSU appears to be contributing to worthwhile innovations but it is not possible to know with certainty how much of the net benefits of the innovations can be attributed to the TSU's role.
|
| 摘要 |
- We recommend that the TSU considers which types of evidence can be collected for all of the projects it supports on a case-by-case basis (considering criteria such as relevance, feasibility and resource implications for data collection) and proactively embeds this into project delivery from the outset of each project.
- It will also be desirable to obtain from the partner organisations participating in each project the extent to which they incur additional costs in implementing it (e.g. set-up and training costs); this information is generally lacking from the evidence we have seen so far.
|
| 主题 | Health Care Quality
; Health Care Technology
; Science
; Technology
; and Innovation Policy
; United Kingdom
|
| URL | https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2639.html
|
| 来源智库 | RAND Corporation (United States)
|
| 引用统计 |
|
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/108814
|
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714 |
Miaoqing Yang,Jack Pollard,Bryn Garrod,et al. Evaluating the impact of the Eastern Academic Health Science Network Transformation Support Unit. 2018.
|
|
文件名：
|
x1533833692440.jpg
|
|
格式：
|
JPEG
|
|
文件名：
|
RAND_RR2639.pdf
|
|
格式：
|
Adobe PDF
|
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
