G2TT
来源类型Research Reports
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR2472
ISBN9781977400543
来源IDRR-2472-AF
Promoting Joint Warfighting Proficiency: The Role of Doctrine in Preparing Airmen for Joint Operations
Miranda Priebe; Laurinda L. Rohn; Alyssa Demus; Bruce McClintock; Derek Eaton; Sarah Harting; Maria McCollester
发表日期2018
出版年2018
页码92
语种英语
结论

Assessment of alignment and tone

  • Air Force doctrine presents many principles, processes, and terms that are consistent with those found in joint doctrine.
  • Air Force doctrine introduces some alternate constructs from those used in joint doctrine, sometimes without noting the differences.
  • Air Force doctrine offers less information on some key topics (e.g., planning processes and considerations) compared with joint doctrine.
  • Some sections of Air Force doctrine displayed a highly joint tone, effectively incorporating joint context and describing the service as a unique, but not superior, contributor to joint teams.
  • Some sections of Air Force doctrine were more insular, focusing primarily on service-specific issues with little discussion of the role the Air Force would play as part of a joint team.

Doctrine and joint constructs in the Air Force

  • Doctrine is not central to Air Force culture, so revisions to service doctrine, on their own, would only have a limited effect on airmen's joint proficiency.
  • Of the limited number of airmen interviewed for this study, many reported that they do not use joint doctrine and constructs regularly throughout their careers, joint experiences often come late, and joint professional military education is often disconnected from joint experiences.
摘要
  • The Air Force could revise its doctrine to more consistently introduce and summarize key joint constructs, use graphics to show relationships between joint and Air Force constructs, and provide more information on planning processes and considerations.
  • Before the Air Force adopts these recommendations, it should consider whether some divergences should be preserved because of the unique characteristics of airpower or whether changes to joint doctrine would be more appropriate.
  • Air Force leaders also need to consider potential trade-offs with other Air Force priorities, such as adopting consistent terminology across the air, space, and cyber domains.
  • The Air Force could provide opportunities for airmen to use joint doctrine and constructs in practice by introducing more joint terminology into tactical publications and activities and looking for opportunities to replace Air Force–specific planning terms and processes with their joint equivalents.
  • Linking formal exposure to joint doctrine with joint experience may also help airmen internalize the joint language and mindset.
主题Joint Operations ; Military Doctrine ; United States Air Force
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2472.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/108818
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Miranda Priebe,Laurinda L. Rohn,Alyssa Demus,et al. Promoting Joint Warfighting Proficiency: The Role of Doctrine in Preparing Airmen for Joint Operations. 2018.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
x1534430166031.jpg(4KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
RAND_RR2472.pdf(2492KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Miranda Priebe]的文章
[Laurinda L. Rohn]的文章
[Alyssa Demus]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Miranda Priebe]的文章
[Laurinda L. Rohn]的文章
[Alyssa Demus]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Miranda Priebe]的文章
[Laurinda L. Rohn]的文章
[Alyssa Demus]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: x1534430166031.jpg
格式: JPEG
文件名: RAND_RR2472.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。