G2TT
来源类型Research Reports
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR2632
来源IDRR-2632-THF
Independent evaluation of the Q Improvement Lab: Final Report
Elisa Liberati; Megan Sim; Jack Pollard; Tom Ling
发表日期2018
出版者RAND Corporation
出版年2018
页码112
语种英语
结论

The Q Lab approach is distinct from other health and social care improvement efforts

  • The Q Lab's mechanisms, particularly its convening function, and its combination of principles of collaboration, creativity, time-boundedness and topic-specificity, distinguish it from other improvement approaches.

A dedicated Q Lab team and a range of stakeholders contributed to effective delivery

  • Having a dedicated Q Lab team was likely essential in creating the momentum around the generation of ideas with the potential for impact. Engaging a range of stakeholders contributed to achieving a holistic understanding of the peer support challenge.

The varied engagement approach and networking opportunities were valued by Q Lab participants

  • The Q Lab team successfully maintained engagement throughout the pilot Lab. Participants had different motivations and faced different barriers to engagement, but valued the relationships nurtured through the Q Lab.

There were benefits as well as the potential for tension in the links with Q, the Health Foundation and NHS Improvement

  • The tight link between the Q Lab and Q benefitted the former, though there is a potential for tension given that membership for both initiatives is not directly linked. The financial support from the Health Foundation and NHS Improvement was vital to the Q Lab.

The Q Lab consolidated learning and knowledge on, and raised the profile of, peer support, and motivated participants to take action

  • Notwithstanding these achievements, participants and stakeholders felt that the Q Lab may not have been able to achieve impact and spread locally and nationally in its pilot year.
摘要
  • The Q Lab should retain many of its core elements, as well as the tools and techniques that support the development of psychologically safe spaces for a wide range of stakeholders to meaningfully interact.
  • The Q Lab team may consider changing the scope of its goals; the topic selection process; when and how it engages with different groups of stakeholders; and how to communicate what success looks like.
  • Going forward the Q Lab can contribute to the evidence base, both of ideas and interventions that emerge from the Lab, but also of the effectiveness of the Q Lab approach itself.
主题Health Care Program Evaluation ; Health Care Quality ; Health Care Workforce ; United Kingdom
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2632.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/108897
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Elisa Liberati,Megan Sim,Jack Pollard,et al. Independent evaluation of the Q Improvement Lab: Final Report. 2018.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
x1541644691172.jpg(7KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
RAND_RR2632.pdf(1684KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Elisa Liberati]的文章
[Megan Sim]的文章
[Jack Pollard]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Elisa Liberati]的文章
[Megan Sim]的文章
[Jack Pollard]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Elisa Liberati]的文章
[Megan Sim]的文章
[Jack Pollard]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: x1541644691172.jpg
格式: JPEG
文件名: RAND_RR2632.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。