G2TT
来源类型Research Reports
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR2314
ISBN9780833098740
来源IDRR-2314-RC
Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life
Jennifer Kavanagh; Michael D. Rich
发表日期2018
出版年2018
页码324
语种英语
结论

What Is Truth Decay?

  • Truth Decay is defined as a set of four related trends: increasing disagreement about facts and analytical interpretations of facts and data; a blurring of the line between opinion and fact; an increase in the relative volume, and resulting influence, of opinion and personal experience over fact; and declining trust in formerly respected sources of factual information.

Is Truth Decay New?

  • This report explores three historical eras — the 1890s, 1920s, and 1960s — for evidence of the four Truth Decay trends and compares those eras with the past two decades (2000s–2010s). Two of the four trends occurred in earlier periods: the blurring of the line between opinion and fact and an increase in the relative volume, and resulting influence, of opinion over fact. Declining trust in institutions, while evident in previous eras, is more severe today. No evidence of an increase in disagreement about facts and analytical interpretations of facts and data was seen in the earlier periods.

What Causes Truth Decay?

  • Four drivers, or causes, of Truth Decay are described: cognitive bias, changes in the information system (including the rise of social media and the 24-hour news cycle), competing demands on the educational system that limit its ability to keep pace with changes in the information system, and political, sociodemographic, and economic polarization. Various agents also amplify Truth Decay's trends.

What Are the Consequences?

  • The consequences of Truth Decay manifest in many ways. The most damaging effects might be the erosion of civil discourse, political paralysis, alienation and disengagement of individuals from political and civic institutions, and uncertainty about U.S. policy.
摘要

Unraveling the Complex System of Truth Decay Will Require Multifaceted and Interdisciplinary Efforts

  • Interdisciplinary research and cooperation among research organizations, policymakers, educators, and other stakeholders will be necessary to shed light on the problem of Truth Decay and to develop a clearer understanding of the problem and devise possible solutions.

There Are Four High-Priority Areas of Research

  • Examine more closely how Truth Decay has manifested in the past at home and abroad, extracting lessons that can assist in the fight against Truth Decay.
  • Further explore Truth Decay trends, including such areas as how media content has changed over time, the ways in which the speed and nature of information flow have evolved, developments in the education system and its curricula, the ways in which polarization and political gridlock have (or have not) worsened, the erosion of civil discourse and engagement, and changes in the severity of uncertainty about U.S. policy.
  • Investigate the processes and mechanisms that connect Truth Decay to information dissemination, processing, and consumption; institutions, authorities, and intermediaries; polarization, engagement, and discourse; the benefits and challenges of technological advancement; and agency. Truth Decay as an interconnected system should also be explored.
  • Finally, develop and evaluate potential solutions and mitigations to the problems caused by Truth Decay. Priority areas include educational interventions; improving the information market; institutional development and rebuilding; bridging social divides; harnessing new technologies; behavioral economics, psychology, and cognitive science; and organizational self-assessment.
主题Civic Education ; Communities ; Databases and Data Collection ; Analysis ; and Processing ; Media Literacy ; Politics and Government ; Social Media Analysis ; United States
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2314.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/108908
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Jennifer Kavanagh,Michael D. Rich. Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life. 2018.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
x1543324212997.jpg(13KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
RAND_RR2314.pdf(2545KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Jennifer Kavanagh]的文章
[Michael D. Rich]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Jennifer Kavanagh]的文章
[Michael D. Rich]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Jennifer Kavanagh]的文章
[Michael D. Rich]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: x1543324212997.jpg
格式: JPEG
文件名: RAND_RR2314.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。