G2TT
来源类型Research Reports
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR2396
ISBN9781977401663
来源IDRR-2396-OSD
Military and Civilian Pay Levels, Trends, and Recruit Quality
James Hosek; Beth J. Asch; Michael G. Mattock; Troy D. Smith
发表日期2018
出版年2018
页码148
语种英语
结论

The regular military compensation (RMC) percentile for 2016 was above the 70th percentile

  • In 2016, the overall RMC percentile was at the 84th percentile for enlisted personnel and the 77th percentile for officers.
  • RMC for enlisted members was at the 87th percentile on average for those with some college and the 85th percentile for those with associate degrees.
  • For officers, RMC was at the 86th percentile for those with bachelor's degrees and around the 70th percentile for those with master's degrees or higher.

The RMC percentile was about the same in 2016 as in 2009

  • The overall RMC percentiles in 2009 for enlisted personnel and officers are virtually the same as for 2016.
  • RMC increased steadily relative to civilian wages from 2000 to 2010 and leveled off afterward. Civilian wages adjusted for inflation trended down from 2000 to 2013, although they have tended to increase since 2013.

Recruit quality rose in three services as the RMC/wage ratio increased

  • Recruit quality is positively associated with the RMC/wage ratio for the Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force but not the Army.
摘要
  • If RMC decreased from its current level relative to civilian pay, the services would need either to allow a decrease in recruit quality or to make up for the decrease in RMC by increasing recruiting resources and special and incentive pays.
  • In balancing the cost of recruit quality with achieving military force capability, it is important to verify whether today's recruit quality is at the right level in the Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force, in which quality has risen, and in the Army, in which it has not. It is also important to determine whether providing broad pay increases is the most efficient way to obtain the appropriate level of quality.
主题Military Compensation ; Military Recruitment ; Wages and Compensation
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2396.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/108914
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
James Hosek,Beth J. Asch,Michael G. Mattock,et al. Military and Civilian Pay Levels, Trends, and Recruit Quality. 2018.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
x1543842781618.jpg(6KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
RAND_RR2396.pdf(1074KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[James Hosek]的文章
[Beth J. Asch]的文章
[Michael G. Mattock]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[James Hosek]的文章
[Beth J. Asch]的文章
[Michael G. Mattock]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[James Hosek]的文章
[Beth J. Asch]的文章
[Michael G. Mattock]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: x1543842781618.jpg
格式: JPEG
文件名: RAND_RR2396.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。