G2TT
来源类型Research Reports
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR2679
来源IDRR-2679-THIS
Enabling NHS staff to contribute to research: Reflecting on current practice and informing future opportunities
Sashka Dimova; Rob Prideaux; Sarah Ball; Amelia Harshfield; Asha Carpenter; Sonja Marjanovic
发表日期2018
出版年2018
页码75
语种英语
结论
  • NHS staff choose to engage with research for a variety of reasons, including: (i) personal interest in a research or evaluation topic; (ii) cultural expectations in some clinical disciplines that involvement in research is part of the job; (iii) a belief that research and evidence can improve the quality and safety of healthcare and patient outcomes; (iv) a positive prior experience with research; and (v) prospects for career development.
  • NHS staff can contribute to research in a variety of ways (e.g. responding to requests for views or for advice, in advisory board roles or as members of clinical research networks, as co-researchers or members of project steering committees).
  • While there are a range of challenges to effective NHS staff engagement with research (e.g. time-related, skills-related, organisational governance-related), there is an evolving evidence base on enabling mechanisms and rewards that could be pursued. The rewards for engagement that matter most to NHS staff include career progression and professional development opportunities related to learning new skills, recognition in professional communities and reputational awards, and seeing the impact of their research contributions on clinical practice.
  • Key impacts from NHS involvement in research include impact on research studies (e.g. on identifying research priorities, on the quality and relevance of study designs, on influential communications and dissemination); impact on the wider research system (e.g. attracting funding); influence on clinical practice (e.g. promoting the uptake of evidence) and personal impact (e.g. professional development and career progression).
摘要
  • Identify the most meaningful types of contribution on a case-by-case basis.
  • Ensure that research roles and responsibilities are clear and well defined.
  • Frame opportunities for involvement in a way that aligns with what motivates NHS staff to engage with health research.
  • Consider how best to use established and trusted professional networks, in combination with online or other types of direct awareness-raising and recruitment.
  • Make engagement opportunities user friendly.
  • Establish and nurture relationships with leadership in healthcare provider organisations
  • Ensure that opportunities to recognise and reward involvement in research are created and communicated to healthcare professionals.
主题Biomedical Research ; Medical Professionals ; United Kingdom ; Workforce Development
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2679.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/108927
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Sashka Dimova,Rob Prideaux,Sarah Ball,et al. Enabling NHS staff to contribute to research: Reflecting on current practice and informing future opportunities. 2018.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
x1544535820880.jpg(11KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
RAND_RR2679.pdf(811KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Sashka Dimova]的文章
[Rob Prideaux]的文章
[Sarah Ball]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Sashka Dimova]的文章
[Rob Prideaux]的文章
[Sarah Ball]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Sashka Dimova]的文章
[Rob Prideaux]的文章
[Sarah Ball]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: x1544535820880.jpg
格式: JPEG
文件名: RAND_RR2679.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。