| 来源类型 | Research Reports
|
| 规范类型 | 报告
|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.7249/RR2628
|
| 来源ID | RR-2628-WODC
|
| Counterterrorism evaluation: Taking stock and looking ahead |
| Jacopo Bellasio; Joanna Hofman; Antonia Ward; Fook Nederveen; Anna Knack; Arya Sofia Meranto; Stijn Hoorens
|
| 发表日期 | 2018
|
| 出版者 | RAND Corporation
|
| 出版年 | 2018
|
| 页码 | 169
|
| 语种 | 英语
|
| 结论 |
- The scope, purpose and activities characterising CT have evolved in recent years in parallel with the growth of the PCVE field. This is both a response to changes in the threat landscape and a result of a growing understanding of terrorism and violent extremism. Dutch authorities have designed and implemented a wide array of CT and PCVE legislation and measures, in recognition of the need for an approach that goes beyond traditional CT measures.
- The study produced an inventory comprising of 48 CT and PCVE evaluations manuscripts (38 in English, 6 in Dutch and 4 in German). These were analysed through an analytical framework to identify trends, patterns and characteristics of CT and PCVE evaluation.
- When compared with results from previous reviews, results from this study suggest that a growing volume of CT and PCVE evaluations is being undertaken and that the majority of these rely on primary data from multiple sources, perspectives and methods. Nonetheless, there appear to be limits to the extent to which evaluation practice has advanced and grown evenly across all areas of CT and PCVE work as significant gaps and shortcomings continue to mar a number of evaluations (e.g. evaluations characterised by designs that undermine their ability to draw robust conclusions about an initiative's impact).
- A number of issues and challenges continue to mar evaluations in the fields of CT and PCVE, not all of them are exclusive to these fields. Lessons and reflections identified from evaluations reviewed pertain to: (i) inherent complexities of the fields of CT and PCVE; (ii) challenges associated with measuring real-world phenomena; (iii) challenges associated with existing evaluation designs; (iv) practical difficulties of conducting evaluations; and (v) drawbacks and benefits of specific evaluation methods.
|
| 摘要 |
- Continue to invest in the evaluation of planned and existing initiatives in the CT and PCVE policy areas, setting minimum quality and robustness requirements for future evaluations.
- Develop new evaluation designs, frameworks and approaches for conducting evaluation in the CT and PCVE policy areas, encouraging the adoption wherever possible of (quasi-)experimental designs.
- Encourage further research on the dynamics, drivers and factors governing the phenomena of radicalisation, violent extremism and terrorism.
- Conduct regularly mapping and stocktaking exercises akin to the present study, providing resources and means required to gain access to CT and PCVE initiatives' evaluators and beneficiaries.
|
| 主题 | Counterterrorism
; Crime and Violence Prevention
; Domestic Terrorism
; Netherlands
; Program Evaluation
|
| URL | https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2628.html
|
| 来源智库 | RAND Corporation (United States)
|
| 引用统计 |
|
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/108952
|
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714 |
Jacopo Bellasio,Joanna Hofman,Antonia Ward,et al. Counterterrorism evaluation: Taking stock and looking ahead. 2018.
|
|
文件名：
|
x1551792149858.jpg
|
|
格式：
|
JPEG
|
|
文件名：
|
RAND_RR2628.pdf
|
|
格式：
|
Adobe PDF
|
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
