Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Dissertations |
规范类型 | 其他 |
来源ID | RGSD-248 |
Essays on Government Policy and Pharmaceutical Innovation | |
Margaret E. Blume-Kohout | |
发表日期 | 2009 |
出版年 | 2009 |
页码 | 109 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | New drug therapies may deliver many social and economic benefits, but current levels of innovation across diseases may not be socially optimal. This dissertation investigates two mechanisms by which governments may influence pharmaceutical research and development (R&D) priorities: (1) public funding for life sciences research; and (2) prescription drug insurance, as in Medicare Part D. The author finds federal funding for life sciences research spurs non-federal investment in academic R&D as well as downstream drug development. Likewise, introduction of Medicare Part D increased both the number of drugs entering clinical trials and firm R&D expenditures for higher-Medicare-share drugs. |
主题 | Health ; Health Care ; and Aging ; Medicare ; Medicare Part D ; Pharmaceutical Drugs ; Science ; Technology ; and Innovation Policy |
URL | https://www.rand.org/pubs/rgs_dissertations/RGSD248.html |
来源智库 | RAND Corporation (United States) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/111862 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Margaret E. Blume-Kohout. Essays on Government Policy and Pharmaceutical Innovation. 2009. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
rgs_dissertations.gi(1KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
RAND_RGSD248.pdf(2691KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Margaret E. Blume-Kohout]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Margaret E. Blume-Kohout]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Margaret E. Blume-Kohout]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。