G2TT
来源类型Perspectives
规范类型论文
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/PE248
来源IDPE-248-A
Conflict with China Revisited: Prospects, Consequences, and Strategies for Deterrence
James Dobbins; Andrew Scobell; Edmund J. Burke; David C. Gompert; Derek Grossman; Eric Heginbotham; Howard J. Shatz
发表日期2017
出版年2017
页码16
语种英语
结论

The United States Will Likely Find Itself Forced to Shift From Deterrence by Denial, Based on Direct Defense of Its Interests and Allies in the Western Pacific, to Deterrence by Punishment, Based on the Threat of Escalation

  • The United States may be able to reduce or delay reliance on escalatory responses by shifting to less vulnerable platforms: longer-range precision strike drones and vessels to carry longer-range drones and submarines, along with the further dispersal of bases and force flows.
  • The United States can encourage and assist allies and partners in the region to increase the range and capabilities of their own air and sea defenses.
  • Barring unforeseen technological developments, it will not be possible for the United States to confidently and indefinitely rely on the direct defense of its regional interests.
摘要

Although armed conflict between the United States and China is not likely, the possibility is real enough to require prudent policies and effective deterrent measures. In the past six years, the range and capabilities of Chinese air and sea defenses have continued to grow, making U.S. forward basing more vulnerable and the direct defense of U.S. interests in the East Asia region potentially more costly. As these trends continue, the United States will find itself gradually pushed more toward the threat of horizontal or vertical escalation for deterrence, with the attendant risks of counterescalation. Neither the United States nor China is likely to employ nuclear weapons, but even an initially localized conflict could quickly spread into the economic, cyber, and space realms, doing considerable damage to both sides. One means of improving the prospects for direct defense and reducing the risk of escalation is for the United States to continue to enable the capabilities and buttress the resolve of China's neighbors. And a parallel effort should be made to draw China into cooperative security endeavors, not only to avoid the appearance of an anti-China coalition but also to obtain greater contributions to international security from the world's second strongest power.

主题China ; East Asia ; International Economic Relations ; Military Strategy ; Security Cooperation
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE248.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/112552
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
James Dobbins,Andrew Scobell,Edmund J. Burke,et al. Conflict with China Revisited: Prospects, Consequences, and Strategies for Deterrence. 2017.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
x1535045908897.jpg(9KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
RAND_PE248.pdf(159KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[James Dobbins]的文章
[Andrew Scobell]的文章
[Edmund J. Burke]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[James Dobbins]的文章
[Andrew Scobell]的文章
[Edmund J. Burke]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[James Dobbins]的文章
[Andrew Scobell]的文章
[Edmund J. Burke]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: x1535045908897.jpg
格式: JPEG
文件名: RAND_PE248.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。