Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | FEEM working papers "Note di lavoro" series |
规范类型 | 论文 |
Green Accounting and Material Flow Analysis Alternatives or Complements? | |
Peter Bartelmus | |
发表日期 | 2000 |
出处 | Climate Change and Sustainable Development |
出版年 | 2000 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Rather than contributing to the proliferation of ad hoc environmental indicators and accounting systems this paper addresses the physical-monetary dichotomy in measuring the interactions between environment and economy by focusing on two systematic approaches which appear to become international standards. They are the physical Material Flow Accounts (MFA) developed by Wuppertal Institute and the physical and monetary System of Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounts (SEEA) of the United Nations. The following discusses some of the pros and cons of both physical and monetary approaches, with a view to linking or combining them. |
特色分类 | Q2,Q3,O47 |
关键词 | Green national accounting,material flow analysis |
URL | https://www.feem.it/en/publications/feem-working-papers-note-di-lavoro-series/green-accounting-and-material-flow-analysis-alternatives-or-complements/ |
来源智库 | Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (Italy) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/116582 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Peter Bartelmus. Green Accounting and Material Flow Analysis Alternatives or Complements?. 2000. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
NDL2000-089.pdf(1021KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Peter Bartelmus]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Peter Bartelmus]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Peter Bartelmus]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。