Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | FEEM working papers "Note di lavoro" series |
规范类型 | 论文 |
Evaluation of Parties and Coalitions After Parliamentary Elections | |
Andranik Tangian | |
发表日期 | 2006 |
出处 | Climate Change and Sustainable Development |
出版年 | 2006 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Five leading German political parties and their coalitions are evaluated with regard to party manifestos and results of the 2005 parliamentary elections. For this purpose, the party manifestos are converted into Yes/No answers to 95 topical questions (Relax the protection against dismissals? Close nuclear power plants? etc.). On each question, every party represents its adherents as well as those of the parties with the same position. Therefore, a party usually represents a larger group than its voters. The popularity of a party is understood to be the percentage of the electorate represented, averaged on all the 95 questions. The universality of a party is the frequency of representing a majority of electors. The questions are considered either unweighted, or weighted by an expert, or weighted by the number of GOOGLE-results for given keywords (the more important the question, the more documents in the Internet). The weighting however plays a negligible role because the party answers are backed up by the party ``ideology'' which determines a high intra-question correlation. The SPD (Social-Democratic Party) did not receive the highest percentage of votes, remains nevertheless the most popular and the most universal German party. A comparison of the election results with the position of German Trade Union Federation (DGB) reveals its high representativeness as well. Finally, all coalitions with two and three parties are also evaluated. The coalition CDU/SPD (which is currently in power) is the most popular, and the coalition SPD/Green/Left-Party (which failed due to personal conflicts) is the most universal. |
特色分类 | D71 |
关键词 | Parliamentary Election,Fractions,Coalitions,Theory of Voting,Mathematical Theory of Democracy,Indices of Popularity and Universality,German Trade Union Federation (DGB) |
URL | https://www.feem.it/en/publications/feem-working-papers-note-di-lavoro-series/evaluation-of-parties-and-coalitions-after-parliamentary-elections/ |
来源智库 | Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (Italy) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/117339 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Andranik Tangian. Evaluation of Parties and Coalitions After Parliamentary Elections. 2006. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Andranik Tangian]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Andranik Tangian]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Andranik Tangian]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。