Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | FEEM working papers "Note di lavoro" series |
规范类型 | 论文 |
Comparing Price and Non-price Approaches to Urban Water Conservation | |
Sheila M. Olmstead; Robert N. Stavins | |
发表日期 | 2008 |
出处 | Climate Change and Sustainable Development |
出版年 | 2008 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | Urban water conservation is typically achieved through prescriptive regulations, including the rationing of water for particular uses and requirements for the installation of particular technologies. A significant shift has occurred in pollution control regulations toward market-based policies in recent decades. We offer an analysis of the relative merits of market-based and prescriptive approaches to water conservation, where prices have rarely been used to allocate scarce supplies. The analysis emphasizes the emerging theoretical and empirical evidence that using prices to manage water demand is more cost-effective than implementing non-price conservation programs, similar to results for pollution control in earlier decades. Price-based approaches also have advantages in terms of monitoring and enforcement. In terms of predictability and equity, neither policy instrument has an inherent advantage over the other. As in any policy context, political considerations are important. |
特色分类 | Q25,Q28,Q58,L95 |
关键词 | Cost-effectiveness,Water Conservation,Market-based Approaches,Policy Instrument Choice,Water Price |
URL | https://www.feem.it/en/publications/feem-working-papers-note-di-lavoro-series/comparing-price-and-non-price-approaches-to-urban-water-conservation/ |
来源智库 | Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (Italy) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/117591 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Sheila M. Olmstead,Robert N. Stavins. Comparing Price and Non-price Approaches to Urban Water Conservation. 2008. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
NDL2008-066.pdf(423KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。