Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | FEEM working papers "Note di lavoro" series |
规范类型 | 论文 |
Article 82 EC - The Problems and The Solution | |
John Temple Lang | |
发表日期 | 2009 |
出处 | Economy and Society |
出版年 | 2009 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | The Commission's Guidance paper on exclusionary abuse under Article 82 EC is open to three fundamental criticisms. First, it leads to less legal certainty, because the rules suggested are vague and imprecise, because dominant companies will not have the information needed to apply them, and because the Commission is trying to change the law, which it has no power to do. Second, it would lead to some anticompetitive effects, because in practice it discourages price competition, by discouraging individualised price negotiations and retroactive rebates, and by suggesting that the Commission will protect not-yet-as-efficient competitors from price competition. Third, it leads to too many "false positives", i.e., findings of exclusionary abuse that are not justified in economics or law. The solution is to return to the test in the Treaty as interpreted by the Court of Justice: an exclusionary abuse must involve limiting the production, marketing or technical development of competitors of the dominant company, if harm is caused to consumers. |
特色分类 | K21 |
关键词 | Article 82EC,Competition,Abuse |
URL | https://www.feem.it/en/publications/feem-working-papers-note-di-lavoro-series/article-82-ec-the-problems-and-the-solution/ |
来源智库 | Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (Italy) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/117742 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | John Temple Lang. Article 82 EC - The Problems and The Solution. 2009. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
NDL2009-065.pdf(324KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[John Temple Lang]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[John Temple Lang]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[John Temple Lang]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。