Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | FEEM working papers "Note di lavoro" series |
规范类型 | 论文 |
Can Uncertainty Justify Overlapping Policy Instruments to Mitigate Emissions? | |
Oskar Lecuyer; Philippe Quirion | |
发表日期 | 2012 |
出处 | Climate Change and Sustainable Development |
出版年 | 2012 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | This article constitutes a new contribution to the analysis of overlapping instruments to cover the same emission sources. Using both an analytical and a numerical model, we show that when the risk that the CO2 price drops to zero and the political unavailability of a CO2 tax (at least in the European Union) are taken into account, it can be socially optimal to implement an additional instrument encouraging the reduction of emissions, for instance a renewable energy subsidy. Our analysis has both a practical and a theoretical purpose. It aims at giving economic insight to policymakers in a context of increased uncertainty concerning the future stringency of the European Emission Trading Scheme. It also gives another rationale for the use of several instruments to cover the same emission sources, and shows the importance of accounting for corner solutions in the definition of the optimal policy mix. |
特色分类 | Q28;Q41;Q48;Q58 |
关键词 | Uncertainty Policy Overlapping Mitigation Policy Energy policy EU-ETS Renewable Energy Corner Solutions Nil CO2 Price |
URL | https://www.feem.it/en/publications/feem-working-papers-note-di-lavoro-series/can-uncertainty-justify-overlapping-policy-instruments-to-mitigate-emissions/ |
来源智库 | Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (Italy) |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/118026 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Oskar Lecuyer,Philippe Quirion. Can Uncertainty Justify Overlapping Policy Instruments to Mitigate Emissions?. 2012. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
201212141148311Nota_(71KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
20121214114924NDL201(2294KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。