| 来源类型 | Monograph (IIASA Working Paper)
|
| 规范类型 | 论文
|
| Optimal Group Decisions. |
| Young HP
|
| 发表日期 | 1994
|
| 出版者 | IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria: WP-94-026
|
| 出版年 | 1994
|
| 语种 | 英语
|
| 摘要 | Consider a group of individuals who must rank a set of decisions or choices. If the members of the group disagree, how should their opinions be reconciled into a group ordering? Historically we may discern two ways of answering this question. The "relativist" approach, which is the dominant one in the modern social choice literature, holds that differences of opinion arise largely from differences in preferences or values. Hence the objective should be to strike a fair compromise between differences of opinion. The "rationalist" approach, which was an article of faith among the eighteenth-century founders of voting theory, holds that differences of opinion arise from misperceptions about the true merit of different decisions. For them the goal was to find the ordering that is most likely to be "correct" or "true". These two positions are not incompatible. Under suitable conditions, in fact, they yield the same method, which was first proposed in a rudimentary form by Condorcet. We show that it can be characterized by a slight weakening of the independence of irrelevant alternative condition. |
| 主题 | Institute Scholars (INS)
|
| URL | http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/4183/
|
| 来源智库 | International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria)
|
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物
|
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/124296
|
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714 |
Young HP. Optimal Group Decisions.. 1994.
|
|
文件名：
|
WP-94-026.pdf
|
|
格式：
|
Adobe PDF
|
此文件暂不支持浏览
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
