| 来源类型 | Monograph (IIASA Interim Report) |
| 规范类型 | 报告 |
| When Do Optimisation Arguments Make Evolutionary Sense? | |
| Gyllenberg M; Metz JAJ; Service R | |
| 发表日期 | 2011 |
| 出版者 | IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria: IR-11-011 |
| 出版年 | 2011 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | In this Chapter we investigate how optimisation approaches fit with the ESS (Evolutionarily Stable Strategy) viewpoint. There are three reasons for embarking on such an effort. The first one is practical. We want to develop a feel for the reach of the optimisation results. In general, optimisation approaches appear to work rather well, notwithstanding their basically awed methodology. (This paradox will be resolved at the end of Subsection 2.3.) The optimisation literature is not so much wrong as imprecise in that its reach is far less than suggested, and its results have been put only to correspondingly restricted tests. The next two reasons come into play when we want to do away with those strong implicit restrictions. The first one is again practical. Given the relative simplicity of optimisation procedures we want a handle on how to rig an eco-evolutionary model so that its ESSes can be calculated from an optimisation principle, as well as insight into the robustness of the results from such limited models. Finally, on the fundamental side there is the wish for insight on a meta-level. In precisely what manner do the various approaches in the literature fit together? In the textbooks one can find various hand-waving answers. We aim for precise ones. |
| 主题 | Evolution and Ecology (EEP) |
| URL | http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/9823/ |
| 来源智库 | International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/125832 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Gyllenberg M,Metz JAJ,Service R. When Do Optimisation Arguments Make Evolutionary Sense?. 2011. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| IR-11-011.pdf（445KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
