| 来源类型 | Article |
| 规范类型 | 其他 |
| DOI | 10.1029/WR018i003p00463 |
| Cost allocation in water resources development. | |
| Young HP; Okada N; Hashimoto T | |
| 发表日期 | 1982 |
| 出处 | Water Resources Research 18 (3): 463-475 |
| 出版年 | 1982 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | Different methods for allocating the joint costs of water supply projects among users are compared on the basis of certain commonsense principles of equity. We contrast the separable costs-remaining benefits (SCRB) method with simple proportional allocation schemes and more sophisticated methods from cooperative game theory, including the Shapley value and variants of the core. Advantages and disadvantages of the methods in practice are examined using a regional water supply system in Sweden. It is argued that these principles provide a useful framework for choosing intelligently among methods. The appropriateness of a method depends on the context, especially on the reliability of information about costs and demands. The conclusion is that there is no one best method, although from a normative standpoint the SCRB method may be one of the worst. |
| 主题 | Water (WAT) |
| URL | http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/14079/ |
| 来源智库 | International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/126795 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Young HP,Okada N,Hashimoto T. Cost allocation in water resources development.. 1982. |
| 条目包含的文件 | ||||||
| 文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
| wrcr3121.pdf（1052KB） | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
