| 来源类型 | Article |
| 规范类型 | 其他 |
| DOI | 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199822/23)14:2/3<163::AID-SDR147>3.0.CO; 2-H |
| End-use or extraction efficiency in natural resource utilization: Which is better? | |
| Wils AB | |
| 发表日期 | 1998 |
| 出处 | System Dynamics Review 14 (2): 163-188 |
| 出版年 | 1998 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | The role of technology innovations in making the wealth of non-renewable resources available to the modern economy is indisputable. Yet, there have been very few studies that compare the effects of different types of technology improvements on natural resource use. This article undertakes the comparison of the relative merits of end-use efficiency and extraction efficiency. The model used includes the dynamics of non-renewable resource use, decreasing ease of access, research and efficiency technologies. The simulation results show that, all else being equal, investments in end-use efficiency research lead to higher levels of service gained from resource use than investments in extraction efficiency alone. A combination of technologies, skewed towards end-use efficiency is superior to either by itself. |
| 主题 | World Population (POP) |
| URL | http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/5359/ |
| 来源智库 | International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/127717 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Wils AB. End-use or extraction efficiency in natural resource utilization: Which is better?. 1998. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Wils AB]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Wils AB]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Wils AB]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
