G2TT
来源类型Article
规范类型其他
DOI10.1080/0042098002357
Discretionary Profit in Subsidised Housing Markets.
Nentjes A; Schöpp W
发表日期2000
出处Urban Studies 37 (1): 181-194
出版年2000
语种英语
摘要In the subsidised housing sector, building corporations can use their market power as purchasers to raise output of subsidised housing to a level higher than it is with perfect competition on both sides of the market. This holds true if the building society is perfectly X-efficient. The proposition is not necessarily true if the corporation maximises a utility function in which discretionary profit, or organisational slack, is an argument. The X-inefficient building society may set output higher or lower than with perfect competition. If the government grants a fixed subsidy per house and tries to constrain X-inefficiency by imposing a maximum price, this might be an incentive for the building corporation to maintain a planned shortage of subsidised houses. However, housing shortages will be smaller and welfare possibly greater than it is with perfect competition. The existence of a perfectly competitive non-subsidised housing sector is for the building corporation an incentive to increase strategically the output of subsidised housing and reduce planned shortages; but it does not necessarily eliminate such shortages.
URLhttp://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/13562/
来源智库International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/127863
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Nentjes A,Schöpp W. Discretionary Profit in Subsidised Housing Markets.. 2000.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Nentjes A]的文章
[Schöpp W]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Nentjes A]的文章
[Schöpp W]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Nentjes A]的文章
[Schöpp W]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。