Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Article |
规范类型 | 其他 |
DOI | 10.1080/0042098002357 |
Discretionary Profit in Subsidised Housing Markets. | |
Nentjes A; Schöpp W | |
发表日期 | 2000 |
出处 | Urban Studies 37 (1): 181-194 |
出版年 | 2000 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | In the subsidised housing sector, building corporations can use their market power as purchasers to raise output of subsidised housing to a level higher than it is with perfect competition on both sides of the market. This holds true if the building society is perfectly X-efficient. The proposition is not necessarily true if the corporation maximises a utility function in which discretionary profit, or organisational slack, is an argument. The X-inefficient building society may set output higher or lower than with perfect competition. If the government grants a fixed subsidy per house and tries to constrain X-inefficiency by imposing a maximum price, this might be an incentive for the building corporation to maintain a planned shortage of subsidised houses. However, housing shortages will be smaller and welfare possibly greater than it is with perfect competition. The existence of a perfectly competitive non-subsidised housing sector is for the building corporation an incentive to increase strategically the output of subsidised housing and reduce planned shortages; but it does not necessarily eliminate such shortages. |
URL | http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/13562/ |
来源智库 | International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/127863 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Nentjes A,Schöpp W. Discretionary Profit in Subsidised Housing Markets.. 2000. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Nentjes A]的文章 |
[Schöpp W]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Nentjes A]的文章 |
[Schöpp W]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Nentjes A]的文章 |
[Schöpp W]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。