| 来源类型 | Article |
| 规范类型 | 其他 |
| Negotiating with terrorists. | |
| Zartman IW; Crump L | |
| 发表日期 | 2003 |
| 出处 | International Negotiation 8 (3) |
| 出版年 | 2003 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 摘要 | Negotiating with terrorists is possible, within limits, as the articles in this issue show and explore. Limits come initially in the distinction between absolute and contingent terrorists, and then between revolutionary and conditional absolutes and between barricaders, kidnappers and hijackers in the contingent category. Revolutionary absolute are nonnegotiable adversaries, but even conditional absolutes are potentially negotiable and contingent terrorists actually seek negotiation. The official negotiator is faced with the task of giving a little in order to get the terrorist to give a lot, a particularly difficult imbalance to obtain given the highly committed and desperate nature of terrorists as they follow rational but highly unconventional tactics. Such are the challenges of negotiating with terrorists that this issue of the journal explores and elucidates. |
| 主题 | Processes of International Negotiation Network (PIN) |
| 关键词 | Negotiation terrorism terms of trade hostages suicide |
| URL | http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/6801/ |
| 来源智库 | International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria) |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/128199 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Zartman IW,Crump L. Negotiating with terrorists.. 2003. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Zartman IW]的文章 |
| [Crump L]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Zartman IW]的文章 |
| [Crump L]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Zartman IW]的文章 |
| [Crump L]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
