G2TT
来源类型Article
规范类型其他
DOI10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.06.032
The logic of reprobation: Assessment and action rules for indirect reciprocity.
Brandt H; Sigmund K
发表日期2004
出处Journal of Theoretical Biology 231 (4): 475-486
出版年2004
语种英语
摘要Ever since image-based models for indirect reciprocity were introduced, the relative merits of scoring vs. standing have been discussed to find out how important it is to differentiate between justified and non-justified defections. This is analogous to the question whether punishment can sustain cooperation even when it is costly. We show that an answer to this question can depend on details of the model, for instance concerning the probability distribution of the number of interactions experienced per player. We use extensive individual-based simulations to compare scoring, standing and other forms of assessing defections, and show that several forms of indirect reciprocation can robustly sustain cooperation. By most standards, standing is better than scoring, but nevertheless scoring is able to sustain cooperation in the presence of errors. The model presented here is based on three specifications: each player has a personal list of images of all co-players, a specific way of judging an observed situation, and a specific strategy to decide whether to cooperate or not.
主题Adaptive Dynamics Network (ADN)
关键词Indirect reciprocity Evolution of cooperation Image-scoring
URLhttp://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/7110/
来源智库International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/128339
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Brandt H,Sigmund K. The logic of reprobation: Assessment and action rules for indirect reciprocity.. 2004.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Brandt H]的文章
[Sigmund K]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Brandt H]的文章
[Sigmund K]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Brandt H]的文章
[Sigmund K]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。