全球智库信息集成服务系统(G2TT): Different methods, different wilds: Evaluating alternative mappings of wildness using fuzzy MCE and Dempster-Shafer MCE.

G2TT

来源类型	Article
规范类型	其他
DOI	10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.10.006
	Different methods, different wilds: Evaluating alternative mappings of wildness using fuzzy MCE and Dempster-Shafer MCE.
	Comber A; Carver S; Fritz S; McMorran R; Washtell J; Fisher P
发表日期	2010
出处	Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 34 (2): 142-152
出版年	2010
语种	英语
摘要	Different multi-criteria evaluation (MCE) approaches are applied to a fuzzy wildness mapping problem in Scotland. The result of fuzzy weighted linear combination and fuzzy order weighted averaging approaches are compared with the application of a Dempster-Shafer MCE. We discuss the implications of different approaches in light of decision making associated with suitability in a context where (i) suitability (wildness) may not be very well defined, (ii) the decision makers may not fully understand the informatics aspects associated with applying weights, but (iii) require decisions to be accountable and transparent. In such situations we suggest that the outputs of Dempster-Shafer MCE may be more appropriate than a fully fuzzy model of suitability.
主题	Forestry (FOR)
关键词	Uncertainty Wildness Fuzzy Dempster-Shafer Multi-criteria evaluation
URL	http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/9268/
来源智库	International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria)
引用统计
资源类型	智库出版物
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/129153
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Comber A,Carver S,Fritz S,et al. Different methods, different wilds: Evaluating alternative mappings of wildness using fuzzy MCE and Dempster-Shafer MCE.. 2010.