Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Article |
规范类型 | 其他 |
DOI | 10.1007/s11027-009-9209-2 |
The European Union Solidarity Fund: Its legitimacy, viability and efficiency. | |
Hochrainer-Stigler S; Linnerooth-Bayer J; Mechler R | |
发表日期 | 2010 |
出处 | Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 15 (7): 797-810 |
出版年 | 2010 |
语种 | 英语 |
摘要 | This paper examines the legitimacy, viability and efficiency of the European Union Solidarity Fund by asking whether the Fund meets its stated purpose of providing solidarity within the EU, whether it is sufficiently capitalized and if it promotes disaster risk reduction in Europe. In examining these questions, we make use of ADAM models of disaster risks throughout Europe. We conclude that the Solidarity Fund falls short on all three counts, and we suggest possible alternatives. Most far-reaching, we explore whether the EUSF could support insurance systems in Europe by, among other possible activities, capitalizing national public-private insurance programs and providing support for government risk transfer. This would leverage the Fund's capital and would overcome barriers to the provision of private and public sector insurance in uncertain catastrophe markets. It would also make insurance more affordable to Europe's most vulnerable communities. Finally, it would reduce the disincentives for risk reduction inherent in post-disaster assistance. |
主题 | Risk and Vulnerability (RAV) |
关键词 | European Solidarity Fund Extreme events Robustness Adaptation Insurance EU policy Risk reduction |
URL | http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/9290/ |
来源智库 | International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Austria) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/129171 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Hochrainer-Stigler S,Linnerooth-Bayer J,Mechler R. The European Union Solidarity Fund: Its legitimacy, viability and efficiency.. 2010. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。